Relationship between angiographic dynamic and densitometric assessment of myocardial reperfusion and survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: The Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in AMI (HORIZONS-AMI) trial - 30/11/11
, Ecaterina Cristea, MD b, Roxana Mehran, MD b, c, Ovidiu Dressler b, Alexandra J. Lansky, MD d, Gregg W. Stone, MD b, eRésumé |
Objectives |
We evaluated 2 different methods of assessing tissue myocardial perfusion (TMP) and its impact on long-term mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Background |
Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention restores brisk epicardial flow in approximately 90% of patients with STEMI, normal TMP is less commonly achieved. Tissue myocardial perfusion has been shown to correlate mostly with early clinical outcomes.
Methods |
We analyzed the outcomes of 3,267 patients in the HORIZONS-AMI study according to final TMP, assessed by angiographic dynamic (Dyn) and densitometric (Den) methods. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify the independent influence of TMP grade 2/3 on late survival.
Results |
Dyn TMP 2/3 was achieved in 2,600 patients (79.6%), whereas Den TMP 2/3 was achieved in 2,483 (76.0%). Mortality was significantly lower in those with Dyn TMP 2/3 compared with TMP 0/1 at 30 days (1.1% vs 6.9%, P < .0001) and at 3 years (5.1% vs 11.2%, P < .0001). Similar results were obtained with Den TMP. Dyn TMP 2/3 was an independent predictor of mortality at both time points (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12-0.37, P < .0001 and HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.73, P < .0001, respectively), as was Den TMP. Survival was comparable in patients with TMP 2 and TMP 3.
Conclusions |
Angiographic TMP can be assessed reliably using either Dyn or Den methods and is a powerful, independent predictor of early and late mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 162 - N° 6
P. 1044-1051 - décembre 2011 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
