S'abonner

Quality of life in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer given maintenance treatment with pemetrexed versus placebo (H3E-MC-JMEN): results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study - 28/02/12

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70339-4 
Chandra P Belani, ProfMD a, , Thomas Brodowicz, MD b, Tudor E Ciuleanu, MD c, Maciej Krzakowski, ProfMD d, Sung Hyun Yang, MD e, Fábio Franke, MD f, Branka Cucevic, MD g, Jayaprakash Madhavan, MD h, i, Armando Santoro, MD j, Rodryg Ramlau, MD k, l, Astra M Liepa, PharmD m, Carla Visseren-Grul, MD n, Patrick Peterson, PhD m, William J John, MD m, Christoph C Zielinski, ProfMD b
a Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA 
b Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 
c Oncology Institute Ion Chiricuţă, Cluj-Napoca, Romania 
d The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre & Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland 
e Korea Cancer Centre Hospital, Seoul, South Korea 
f Hospital de Caridade de Ijuí, Ijuí, Brazil 
g University Hospital for Lung Diseases, Jordanovac, Croatia 
h Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, India 
i Kerala Institute of Medical Sciences, Trivandrum, India 
j Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan, Italy 
k Regional Centre for Lung Disease, Wielkopolskie Centrum, Poznań, Poland 
l Wielkopolskie Centrum Pulmonologii i Torakochirurgii, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland 
m Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA 
n Eli Lilly Netherlands, Utrecht, Netherlands 

* Correspondence to: Prof Chandra P Belani, Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, CH72, Hershey, PA 17033, USA

Summary

Background

Pemetrexed maintenance therapy significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival compared with placebo, and had a good safety profile in a phase 3 placebo-controlled study in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results for quality of life, symptom palliation, and tolerability are presented here.

Methods

After four cycles of platinum-based induction therapy, 663 patients with stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) from March 15, 2005, to July 20, 2007, using the Pocock and Simon minimisation method to receive pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 every 21 days; n=441) or placebo (n=222) plus best supportive care until disease progression. The primary efficacy data have been reported previously. Patients completed the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) at baseline, after each cycle, and post-discontinuation. Worsening of symptoms was defined as an increase of 15 mm or more from baseline on a 100 mm scale for each LCSS item. The primary outcome for these quality-of-life analyses was time to worsening of symptoms, analysed for all randomised patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00102804.

Findings

Baseline characteristics, including LCSS scores, were well balanced between groups. Baseline LCSS scores were low, indicating low symptom burden for patients without disease progression after completion of first-line treatment. Longer time to worsening was recorded for pain (hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·59–0·99; p=0·041) and haemoptysis (HR 0·58, 95% CI 0·34–0·97; p=0·038) with pemetrexed than with placebo; no other significant differences in analyses of time to worsening were noted. Additional longitudinal analyses showed a greater increase in loss of appetite in the pemetrexed group than in the placebo group (4·3 mm vs 0·2 mm; p=0·028). Rates of resource use were statistically higher for pemetrexed than for placebo: admissions to hospital for drug-related adverse events (19 [4%] vs none; p=0·001), transfusions (42 [10%] vs seven [3%]; p=0·003), and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (26 [6%] vs four [2%]; p=0·017).

Interpretation

Quality of life during maintenance therapy with pemetrexed is similar to placebo, except for a small increase in loss of appetite, and significantly delayed worsening of pain and haemoptysis. In view of the improvements in overall and progression-free survival noted with pemetrexed maintenance therapy, such treatment is an option for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who have not progressed after platinum-based induction therapy.

Funding

Eli Lilly.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2012  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 13 - N° 3

P. 292-299 - mars 2012 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Assessment of symptomatic women for early diagnosis of ovarian cancer: results from the prospective DOvE pilot project
  • Lucy Gilbert, Olga Basso, John Sampalis, Igor Karp, Claudia Martins, Jing Feng, Sabrina Piedimonte, Louise Quintal, Agnihotram V Ramanakumar, Janet Takefman, Maria S Grigorie, Giovanni Artho, Srinivasan Krishnamurthy, for the DOvE Study Group †
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Efficacy and safety of erlotinib versus chemotherapy in second-line treatment of patients with advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer with poor prognosis (TITAN): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study
  • Tudor Ciuleanu, Lilia Stelmakh, Saulius Cicenas, Skaidrius Miliauskas, Alexandru Calin Grigorescu, Carina Hillenbach, Hrefna Kristin Johannsdottir, Barbara Klughammer, Emilio Esteban Gonzalez

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.