S'abonner

Asthma outcomes: Biomarkers - 02/03/12

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.979 
Stanley J. Szefler, MD a : coprimary author, Sally Wenzel, MD b : coprimary author, Robert Brown, MD, MPH c, Serpil C. Erzurum, MD d, John V. Fahy, MD, MSc e, Robert G. Hamilton, PhD c, John F. Hunt, MD f, Hirohito Kita, MD g, Andrew H. Liu, MD a, Reynold A. Panettieri, MD h, Robert P. Schleimer, PhD i, Michael Minnicozzi, PhD j,
a National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo 
b University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa 
c Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md 
d Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 
e University of California, San Francisco, Calif 
f University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va 
g Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn 
h University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa 
i Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill 
j National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Md 

Corresponding author: Michael Minnicozzi, PhD, Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation (DAIT), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 6610 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.

Abstract

Background

Measurement of biomarkers has been incorporated within clinical research studies of asthma to characterize the population and associate the disease with environmental and therapeutic effects.

Objective

National Institutes of Health institutes and federal agencies convened an expert group to propose which biomarkers should be assessed as standardized asthma outcomes in future clinical research studies.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature to identify studies that developed and/or tested asthma biomarkers. We identified biomarkers relevant to the underlying disease process progression and response to treatment. We classified the biomarkers as either core (required in future studies), supplemental (used according to study aims and standardized), or emerging (requiring validation and standardization). This work was discussed at an National Institutes of Health–organized workshop convened in March 2010 and finalized in September 2011.

Results

Ten measures were identified; only 1, multiallergen screening to define atopy, is recommended as a core asthma outcome. Complete blood counts to measure total eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), sputum eosinophils, urinary leukotrienes, and total and allergen-specific IgE are recommended as supplemental measures. Measurement of sputum polymorphonuclear leukocytes and other analytes, cortisol measures, airway imaging, breath markers, and system-wide studies (eg, genomics, proteomics) are considered as emerging outcome measures.

Conclusion

The working group participants propose the use of multiallergen screening in all asthma clinical trials to characterize study populations with respect to atopic status. Blood, sputum, and urine specimens should be stored in biobanks, and standard procedures should be developed to harmonize sample collection for clinical trial biorepositories.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Multiallergen screen, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, sputum eosinophils, total eosinophils, IgE, urinary leukotriene E4

Abbreviations used : ATS, CBC, CT, EBC, ERS, FDA, Feno, 5-LO, HRCT, LTE4, NIH, NO


Plan


 The Asthma Outcomes workshop was funded by contributions from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; and the Merck Childhood Asthma Network, as well as by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Contributions from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; and the US Environmental Protection Agency funded the publication of this article and all other articles in this supplement.
 Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: S. J. Szefler is a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Merck, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, and Schering-Plough; and has received research support from the NIH (NHLBI, NIAID, NIEHS) and the Environmental Protection Agency. J. V. Fahy is on the Cytokinetics Scientific advisory board; has received consulting fees from Amgen, Gilcad, Five Prime Therapeutics, Merck, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Portola Pharmaceuticals; and has received research support from the NIH (NHLBI and NIAID) and Genentech. J. F. Hunt is on the Pulse Health LLC advisory board; is founder of Respiratory Research, Inc; has received research support from the NIH-NIAID and Altrea; and is Chair of the AAAAI Asthma Diagnosis and Pharmacotherapeutics Committee and Cough Committee. A. H. Liu has received speaker honoraria from Merck; is on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for GlaxoSmithKline; and is a consultant for DBV. R. A. Panettieri, Jr, is a consultant for Johnson & Johnson, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, and Merck; and has received research support from AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, and Roche. R. P. Schleimer is a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline and Intersect ENT. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.


© 2012  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 129 - N° 3S

P. S9-S23 - mars 2012 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Asthma outcomes workshop: Overview
  • William W. Busse, Wayne J. Morgan, Virginia Taggart, Alkis Togias
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Asthma outcomes: Composite scores of asthma control
  • Michelle M. Cloutier, Michael Schatz, Mario Castro, Noreen Clark, H. William Kelly, Rita Mangione-Smith, James Sheller, Christine Sorkness, Stuart Stoloff, Peter Gergen

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.