Does increased experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy yield more complex bile duct injuries? - 24/03/12

Abstract |
Background |
Two decades since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the rate of bile duct injuries still remains higher than in the open cholecystectomy era.
Methods |
The rate and complexity of bile duct injuries was evaluated in 83,449 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 1995 and 2008 in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California system. Fifty-six surgeons who performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the past were surveyed to determine factors that predispose to bile duct injuries.
Results |
The overall incidence of bile duct injuries was .10%; 59.5% of the 84 injuries were cystic duct leaks. Incidence varied slightly from .10% (1995–1998) to .08% (1999–2003) and .12% (2004–2008). There was a trend toward more proximal injuries (injury <2 cm from the bifurcation: 14.3% to 44.4% to 50.0% of major injuries). The misinterpretation of anatomy was cited by 92.9% of surgeons as the primary cause of bile duct injuries; 70.9% cited a lack of experience as a contributing factor.
Conclusions |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has an overall low risk of bile duct injuries; the rate remains constant, but injury complexity may have increased over time.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Bile duct injuries, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Strasberg classification, Kaiser Permanente
Plan
| Supported by Kaiser Permanente, Northern California Residency Program, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals. |
Vol 203 - N° 4
P. 480-487 - avril 2012 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
