Effect of alternate-week versus continuous dexamethasone scheduling on the risk of osteonecrosis in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results from the CCG-1961 randomised cohort trial - 28/08/12
, Meenakshi Devidas, PhD b, James B Nachman, ProfMD c, †, Harland N Sather, PhD d, Stephen P Hunger, ProfMD e, Peter G Steinherz, ProfMD f, g, Paul S Gaynon, ProfMD h, Nita L Seibel, MD ion behalf of the Children’s Oncology Group
Summary |
Background |
Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is curable in more than 80% of children and adolescents who exhibit high-risk features. However, treatments are associated with symptomatic osteonecrosis that disproportionately affects adolescents. Based on the findings from the CCG-1882 trial, the CCG-1961 trial was designed to assess whether dexamethasone dose modification would reduce the risk of osteonecrosis. We therefore compared use of continuous versus alternate-week dexamethasone within standard and intensified post-induction treatments.
Methods |
In the CCG-1961 trial, a multicohort cooperative group trial, 2056 patients (aged 1–21 years) with newly diagnosed high-risk ALL (age ≥10 years, white blood cell count ≥50×109 per L, or both) were recruited. To address osteonecrosis, a novel alternate-week schedule of dexamethasone (10 mg/m2 per day on days 0–6 and 14–20) was compared with standard continuous dexamethasone (10 mg/m2 per day on days 0–20) in computer-generated randomised regimens with permuted blocks within double or single delayed intensification phases, respectively. Masking was not possible because of the differences in the treatments. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00002812.
Findings |
Symptomatic osteonecrosis was diagnosed in 143 patients at 377 confirmed skeletal sites, resulting in 139 surgeries. In patients aged 1–21 years, the overall cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis at 5 years was 7·7% (SE 0·9), correlating with age at ALL diagnosis (1–9 years, 1·0% [0·5]; 10–15 years, 9·9% [1·5], hazard ratio 10·4 [4·8–22·5]; 16–21 years, 20·0% [4·3], 22·2 [10·0–49·3]; p<0·0001) and sex of the patients aged 10–21 years (girls 15·7% [2·5] vs boys 9·3% [1·7], 1·7 [1·2–2·4]; p=0·001). For patients aged 10 years and older with a rapid response to induction treatment, the use of alternate-week dexamethasone during phases of delayed intensification significantly reduced osteonecrosis incidence compared with continuous dexamethasone (8·7% [2·1] vs 17·0% [2·9], 2·1 [1·4–3·1]; p=0·0005), especially in those aged 16 years and older (11·3% [5·3] vs 37·5% [11·0], p=0·0003; girls 17·2% [8·1] vs 43·9% [14·1], p=0·05; boys 7·7% [5·9] vs 34·6% [11·6], p=0·0014).
Interpretation |
Alternate-week dexamethasone during delayed intensification phases, a simple dose modification, reduces the risk of osteonecrosis in children and adolescents given intensified treatment for high-risk ALL. Its use is being evaluated in children with standard risk ALL.
Funding |
US National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 13 - N° 9
P. 906-915 - septembre 2012 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
