Repeated low-dose intradermal allergen injection suppresses allergen-induced cutaneous late responses - 29/09/12
, Stephen J. Till, MRCP, PhD a, b, cAbstract |
Background |
Subcutaneous immunotherapy with high-dose grass pollen was first described more than 100 years ago. This treatment suppresses allergen-induced cutaneous late responses, with lesser effects on early responses. In contrast, low-dose subcutaneous immunotherapy has not shown clinical benefit. Uncontrolled reports from the early 20th century describe low-dose allergen inoculation directly into the dermis, an immunologically active area containing abundant dendritic cells and lymphatics.
Objective |
We sought to investigate the effect of low-dose intradermal grass pollen administration on cutaneous reactivity to allergen.
Methods |
Thirty adults sensitized to grass and tree pollens were randomized to receive (1) 6 repeat intradermal injections at 2-week intervals of grass pollen extract (estimated 7 ng of the major grass allergen Phl p 5 per injection), (2) 2 intradermal injections separated by 10 weeks, or (3) a single intradermal injection at 10 weeks. At the end of the study, cutaneous early and late responses were measured after double-blind intradermal injection with grass and birch pollen.
Results |
Participants who received 6 fortnightly intradermal grass pollen injections had markedly smaller cutaneous late responses to grass pollen than control subjects who received 2 injections separated by 10 weeks (P < .01) or a single injection (P < .001) and showed induction of grass pollen–specific IgG antibodies. Suppression was observed whether late responses were measured on the arms or the back. However, early responses were equivalent in all groups.
Conclusion |
Low-dose intradermal allergen, like conventional subcutaneous high-dose immmunotherapy, suppresses allergen-induced cutaneous late responses in a manner that is allergen specific, systemic, and associated with induction of IgG antibodies.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : Tolerance, immunotherapy, intradermal, grass, late response, IgE
Abbreviations used : BU, DC, FAB, SQ-U
Plan
| S.J.T. was supported by a Clinician Scientist Fellowship from the Health Foundation and Academy of Medical Sciences. This study was also supported by the Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals Charitable Trust. |
|
| Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: G. Rotiroti has received travel expenses from ALK-Abelló, GlaxoSmithKline, and Allergy Therapeutics. S. R. Durham has received consultancy fees from ALK-Abelló, Merck, Circassia, GlaxoSmithKline, and Boehringer Ingelheim; has provided expert testimony for Weil; has received research support from ALK-Abelló and Merck; and has received lecture fees from Merck, ALK-Abelló, and GlaxoSmithKline. S. J. Till has received research support from ALK-Abelló. M. Shamji declares that he has no relevant conflicts of interest. |
Vol 130 - N° 4
P. 918 - octobre 2012 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
