Threshold dose distributions for 5 major allergenic foods in children - 27/12/12
, Berber J. Vlieg-Boerstra, PhD, RD b, Abstract |
Background |
For most allergenic foods, insufficient threshold dose information within the population restricts the advice on levels of unintended allergenic foods which should trigger precautionary labeling on prepackaged foods.
Objective |
We wanted to derive threshold dose distributions for major allergenic foods and to elaborate the protein doses at which a proportion of the allergic population is likely to respond.
Methods |
For 7 allergenic foods double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) with a positive outcome for allergic reactions were selected from the clinical database of children routinely tested to diagnose food allergy at the University Medical Center Groningen. For each allergen 2 population threshold distributions were determined with the individual minimal eliciting dose and the preceding dose of each DBPCFC for objective symptoms and any symptom (either subjective or objective).
Results |
Individual positive DBPCFCs were available for peanut (n = 135), cow’s milk (n = 93), hen’s egg (n = 53), hazelnut (n = 28), and cashew nut (n = 31). Fewer children were challenged with soy (n = 10) or walnut (n = 13). Threshold dose distributions showed a good statistical and visual fit. The protein dose at which 5% of the allergic population is likely to respond with objective reactions was 1.6 mg for peanut, 1.1 mg for cow’s milk, 1.5 mg for hen’s egg, 7.4 mg for cashew nut, and 0.29 mg for hazelnut. Thresholds for any symptom were on average 2 to 6 times lower than for objective symptoms. The 95% upper and lower confidence intervals of the threshold distributions were overlapping. The peanut threshold distribution on objective symptoms was similar to the distribution of another European center.
Conclusions |
Threshold distribution curves and eliciting doses are a powerful tool to compare different allergenic foods and for informing policy on precautionary labeling.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : Allergenic foods, threshold dose distributions, children, eliciting dose
Abbreviations used : DBPCFC, ED, LOAEL, NOAEL
Plan
| Part of this study was conducted within the framework of the Food Safety Knowledge Development program of TNO, with financial support of the Dutch Ministry of Health. |
|
| Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: W. M. Blom and A. Kruizinga have received research support from the Dutch Ministry of Health and are employed by TNO. B. Vlieg-Boerstra has consultant arrangements with Mead Johnson, has received grants from ALK Abelló and Nutricia, has received payment for lectures, including service on speakers' bureaus, from Mead Johnson and Nutricia, and has received travel expenses from Mead Johnson and Friso Kindervoeding. G. Houben has received research support from the Dutch Ministry of Health, is employed by TNO, and has received travel expenses from the Food Allergy Research and Resources Programme. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest. |
Vol 131 - N° 1
P. 172-179 - janvier 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
