Ultrasonographically Guided Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation of Children and Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis - 21/03/13
, Zachary Fritze a, Ben Vandermeer, BSc, MSc b, Terry Klassen, MD, MSc, FRCPC c, Sarah Curtis, MD, MSc, FRCPC aRésumé |
Study objective |
Peripheral intravenous cannulation is procedurally challenging and painful. We perform a systematic review to evaluate ultrasonographic guidance as an aid to peripheral intravenous cannulation.
Methods |
We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google.ca. We included randomized trials evaluating ultrasonographically guided peripheral intravenous cannulation and reporting risk of peripheral intravenous cannulation failure, number of attempts, procedure time, or time from randomization to peripheral intravenous cannulation. We separately analyzed pediatric and adult data and emergency department (ED), ICU, and operating room data. Quality assessment used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Results |
We identified 4,664 citations, assessed 403 full texts for eligibility, and included 9 trials. Five had low risk, 1 high risk, and 3 unclear risk of bias. A pediatric ED trial found that ultrasonography decreased mean difference (MD) in the number of attempts (MD −2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] −2.73 to −1.27) and procedure time (MD −8.10 minutes; 95% CI −12.48 to −3.72 minutes). In an operating room pediatric trial, ultrasonography decreased risk of first-attempt failure (risk ratio 0.23; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.69), number of attempts (MD −1.50; 95% CI −2.52 to −0.48), and procedure time (MD −5.95; 95% CI −10.21 to −1.69). Meta-analysis of adult ED trials suggests that ultrasonography decreases the number of attempts (MD −0.43; 95% CI −0.81 to −0.05). Ultrasonography decreased risk of failure (risk ratio 0.47; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.87) in an adult ICU trial.
Conclusion |
Ultrasonography may decrease peripheral intravenous cannulation attempts and procedure time in children in ED and operating room settings. Few outcomes reached statistical significance. Larger well-controlled trials are needed.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. Dr. Curtis received support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. |
|
| Please see page 455 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article. |
|
| Supervising editor: Peter C. Wyer, MD. |
|
| Author contributions: TK and SC conceived the review and obtained research funding. JH and SC designed the review and wrote the protocol. JH and ZF acquired the data. JH, ZF, BV, and SC analyzed and interpreted the data. JH drafted the article. All authors critically revised the article for important intellectual content. JH, ZF, and BV performed statistical analysis. SC supervised the review. JH takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
|
| Publication date: Available online February 15, 2013. |
|
| A 29DGKY8 survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com. |
|
| A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com. |
Vol 61 - N° 4
P. 444 - avril 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
