Risk stratification of upper GI bleeding with an esophageal capsule - 16/05/13
Résumé |
Background |
Analysis of upper GI bleeding (UGIB) presentations to our institutions suggests that many patients admitted for endoscopic investigation could be managed safely as outpatients.
Objective |
To learn whether an esophageal capsule could identify a low-risk group of patients with UGIB who could safely wait for elective EGD.
Design |
Diagnostic, nonrandomized, single-blind (investigator) study.
Setting |
Three tertiary-care referral centers.
Patients |
Eighty-three consecutive adult patients referred for management of UGIB.
Intervention |
A capsule endoscopy (CE) was performed before EGD for the investigation and management of UGIB.
Main Outcome Measurements |
Detection rates of UGIB source and identification of a low-risk group of patients who would have been suitable for outpatient EGD based on CE findings.
Results |
In total, 62 of 83 patients (75%) had a cause for bleeding identified. Findings were concordant across both modalities in 34 patients (55%). Twenty-one patients (38%) with positive EGD results had negative CE results, 7 of whom were due to lack of duodenal visualization alone. However, 7 of 28 patients (25%) with normal EGD results had positive CE results. The subgroup of patients with duodenal visualization on CE, 23 of 25 (92%), were concordant with EGD for low-risk lesions that would have been suitable for outpatient management.
Limitations |
Low duodenal visualization rates with CE and low concordance between EGD and CE.
Conclusion |
Although CE is not currently ready to be used as a triage tool, when duodenal visualization was achieved CE correlated well with EGD findings and identified 92% of patients who may have been managed as outpatients. (Clinical trial registration number: ACTRN 12609000580279.)
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Abbreviations : CE, UGIB
Plan
| DISCLOSURE: Esophageal capsules were donated by Given Imaging. No other financial relationships relevant to this publication were disclosed. |
Vol 77 - N° 6
P. 891-898 - juin 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
