S'abonner

Head-to-Head Comparison of Disaster Triage Methods in Pediatric, Adult, and Geriatric Patients - 17/05/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.12.023 
Keith P. Cross, MD, MS a, , Mark X. Cicero, MD b
a Department of Pediatrics, Kosair Children's Hospital, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 
b Department of Pediatrics, Yale–New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 

Address for correspondence: Keith P. Cross, MD, MS

Résumé

Study objective

A variety of methods have been proposed and used in disaster triage situations, but there is little more than expert opinion to support most of them. Anecdotal disaster experiences often report mediocre real-world triage accuracy. The study objective was to determine the accuracy of several disaster triage methods when predicting clinically important outcomes in a large cohort of trauma victims.

Methods

Pediatric, adult, and geriatric trauma victims from the National Trauma Data Bank were assigned triage levels, using each of 6 disaster triage methods: simple triage and rapid treatment (START), Fire Department of New York (FDNY), CareFlight, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Sacco Score, and Unadjusted Sacco Score. Methods for approximating triage systems were vetted by subject matter experts. Triage assignments were compared against patient mortality at hospital discharge with area under the receiver operator curve. Secondary outcomes included death in the emergency department, use of a ventilator, and lengths of stay. Subgroup analysis assessed triage accuracy in patients by age, trauma type, and sex.

Results

In this study, 530,695 records were included. The Sacco Score predicted mortality most accurately, with area under the receiver operator curve of 0.883 (95% confidence interval 0.880 to 0.885), and performed well in most subgroups. FDNY was more accurate than START for adults but less accurate for children. CareFlight was best for burn victims, with area under the receiver operator curve of 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.85 to 0.89) but mistriaged more salvageable trauma patients to “dead/black” (41% survived) than did other disaster triage methods (≈10% survived).

Conclusion

Among 6 disaster triage methods compared against actual outcomes in trauma registry patients, the Sacco Score predicted mortality most accurately. This analysis highlighted comparative strengths and weakness of START, FDNY, CareFlight, and Sacco, suggesting areas in which each might be improved. The GCS predicted outcomes similarly to dedicated disaster triage strategies.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Please see page 669 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
 A L63ZL7D survey is available with each research article published on the Web at www.annemergmed.com.
 A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.
 Supervising editor: Robert A. De Lorenzo, MD, MSM
 Author contributions: KPC and MXC conceived and designed the study, obtained institutional review/approval, and prepared the article. KPC performed the data analysis. KPC takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.
 Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. This study was internally funded by the Department of Pediatrics at the University of Louisville School of Medicine.
 The American College of Surgeons requires authors to report that any content reproduced from the NTDB remains the full and exclusive copyrighted property of the American College of Surgeons. The College is not responsible for any findings or claims in this work based on the original NTDB data, text, tables, or figures.
 Publication date: Available online March 7, 2013.


© 2013  American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 61 - N° 6

P. 668 - juin 2013 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Demonstrations of Clinical Initiatives to Improve Palliative Care in the Emergency Department: A Report From the IPAL-EM Initiative
  • Tammie Quest, Sherol Herr, Sangeeta Lamba, David Weissman, IPAL-EM Advisory Board
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Systematic Review of Strategies to Manage and Allocate Scarce Resources During Mass Casualty Events
  • Justin W. Timbie, Jeanne S. Ringel, D. Steven Fox, Francesca Pillemer, Daniel A. Waxman, Melinda Moore, Cynthia K. Hansen, Ann R. Knebel, Richard Ricciardi, Arthur L. Kellermann

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.