A Brief, Low-cost Intervention Improves the Quality of Ambulatory Gastroenterology Consultation Notes - 23/07/13
, Lukejohn W. Day, MD a, b, Delphine S. Tuot, MDCM, MAS a, c, Ricardo Alvarez, MD d, Albert Yu, MD e, Alice Hm Chen, MD, MPH a, fAbstract |
Background |
Effective communication between primary care providers and specialty providers is important to facilitate high-quality specialty care. Few studies have assessed the quality of communication from specialist to primary care providers or implemented interventions to improve quality. We developed a brief, low-cost intervention designed to improve the quality of ambulatory gastroenterology consultation notes written by fellows and nurse practitioners in our urban health care system.
Methods |
Six physicians (3 specialists and 3 primary care providers) scored pre- and postintervention notes using an objective quality assessment instrument that had excellent inter-rater reliability. They were blinded to note date, author, and pre/postintervention status. The primary outcome was improvement in Composite Quality Score, an objective, comprehensive assessment of quality. Secondary outcomes included improvements in 3 specific domains, and Global Quality Score (a subjective measure of quality).
Results |
Two hundred pre- and 200 postintervention notes written by 6 fellows and 2 nurse practitioners were included. Composite Quality Score improved from 3.74 (of 5) to 4.09 (P <.001 in adjusted analysis). All secondary outcomes improved in adjusted analyses as well. The largest increase was seen in Communication Domain (22% increase). Fellow-written notes had higher scores than nurse practitioner-written notes, but nurse practitioner-written notes improved to a greater degree.
Conclusion |
A brief, low-cost intervention significantly improved the quality of ambulatory gastroenterology consultation notes written by fellows and nurse practitioners. Communication between primary care providers and specialists is an important area for further study.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Communication, Consultation and referral, Gastroenterology, Midlevel providers, Primary care, Quality, Specialty care
Plan
| Funding: This study was funded by a grant from the Kaiser Permanente Specialty Care Initiative. DST is partially funded by Career Development Award K23DK094850. Neither of these funding sources had any role in the design and conduct of the study, the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. |
|
| Conflict of Interest: None. |
|
| Authorship: JLS had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: JLS, LWD, DST, RA, AY, AHC; Acquisition of data: JLS; Analysis and interpretation of data: JLS, DST; Drafting of manuscript: JLS; Critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content: JLS, LWD, DST, RA, AY, AHC; Statistical analysis: JLS Obtained funding: AHC; Administrative, technical: AHC. |
Vol 126 - N° 8
P. 732-738 - août 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
