S'abonner

Transurethral surgery and twice-daily radiation plus paclitaxel-cisplatin or fluorouracil-cisplatin with selective bladder preservation and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (RTOG 0233): a randomised multicentre phase 2 trial - 27/07/13

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70255-9 
Timur Mitin, DrMD a, , Daniel Hunt, PhD b, William U Shipley, ProfMD a, Donald S Kaufman, ProfMD a, Robert Uzzo, ProfMD c, Chin-Lee Wu, MD a, Mark K Buyyounouski, MD c, Howard Sandler, ProfMD d, Anthony L Zietman, ProfMD a
a Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA 
b Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Statistical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
c Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA 
d Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA 

* Correspondence to: Dr Timur Mitin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA

Summary

Background

We assessed effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of paclitaxel or fluorouracil when added to radiation plus cisplatin followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in a programme of selected bladder preservation for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Methods

In our randomised phase 2 trial, we enrolled patients with T2–4a transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder at 24 medical centres in the USA. We randomly allocated patients to receive paclitaxel plus cisplatin (paclitaxel group) or fluorouracil plus cisplatin (fluorouracil group) with twice-daily radiation in random block sizes per site on the basis of clinical T-stage (T2 vs T3–4). Patients and physicians were aware of treatment assignment. All patients had transurethral resection of bladder tumour and twice-daily radiotherapy to 40·3 Gy, along with allocated chemotherapy, followed by cystoscopic and biopsy assessment of response. Patients who had a tumour response with downstaging to T0, Tcis, or Ta received consolidation chemoradiotherapy to 64·3 Gy, with the same chemotherapy regimen as in the induction phase. Patients received adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine-paclitaxel after the end of chemoradiotherapy. If, after induction, persistent disease was graded as T1 or worse, we recommended patients undergo cystectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. We assessed the primary endpoints of rates of treatment completion and toxic effects in all randomly allocated patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00055601.

Findings

Between Dec 13, 2002, and Jan 11, 2008, we enrolled 97 patients, of whom 93 were eligible for analysis. Median follow-up was 5·0 years (IQR 5·0–6·2). Of 46 patients in the paclitaxel group, 45 (98%) completed induction (16 [35%] with grade 3–4 toxicity), 39 (85%) completed induction and consolidation (11 [24%] with grade 3–4 toxicity due to consolidation), and 31 (67%) completed the entire protocol with adjuvant chemotherapy. 34 (85%) of 40 assessable patients in the paclitaxel group had grade 3–4 toxicity during adjuvant chemotherapy. Of 47 patients in the fluorouracil group, 45 (96%) completed induction (nine [19%] with grade 3–4 toxicity), 39 (83%) completed induction and consolidation (12 [26%] had grade 3–4 toxicity due to consolidation), and 25 (53%) completed the entire protocol with adjuvant chemotherapy. 31 (76%) of 41 assessable patients in the fluorouracil group had grade 3–4 toxicity during adjuvant chemotherapy. Five (11%) patients treated with the paclitaxel regimen and three (6%) patients treated with the fluorouracil regimen developed late grade 3–4 radiotherapy toxicities. 11 (24%) patients treated with the paclitaxel regimen and 16 (34%) patients treated with the fluorouracil regimen developed late grade 3–4 toxicities unrelated to radiotherapy. One patient (in the fluorouracil group) died during follow-up. Six (13%) patients in the paclitaxel group and in three (6%) patients in the fluorouracil group discontinued due to treatment-related toxicity.

Interpretation

In the absence of phase 3 data, our findings could inform selection of a bladder-sparing trimodality chemotherapy regimen for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Funding

US National Cancer Institute.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2013  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 14 - N° 9

P. 863-872 - août 2013 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Hormone-receptor expression and ovarian cancer survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study
  • Weiva Sieh, Martin Köbel, Teri A Longacre, David D Bowtell, Anna deFazio, Marc T Goodman, Estrid Høgdall, Suha Deen, Nicolas Wentzensen, Kirsten B Moysich, James D Brenton, Blaise A Clarke, Usha Menon, C Blake Gilks, Andre Kim, Jason Madore, Sian Fereday, Joshy George, Laura Galletta, Galina Lurie, Lynne R Wilkens, Michael E Carney, Pamela J Thompson, Rayna K Matsuno, Susanne Krüger Kjær, Allan Jensen, Claus Høgdall, Kimberly R Kalli, Brooke L Fridley, Gary L Keeney, Robert A Vierkant, Julie M Cunningham, Louise A Brinton, Hannah P Yang, Mark E Sherman, Montserrat García-Closas, Jolanta Lissowska, Kunle Odunsi, Carl Morrison, Shashikant Lele, Wiam Bshara, Lara Sucheston, Mercedes Jimenez-Linan, Kristy Driver, Jennifer Alsop, Marie Mack, Valerie McGuire, Joseph H Rothstein, Barry P Rosen, Marcus Q Bernardini, Helen Mackay, Amit Oza, Eva L Wozniak, Elizabeth Benjamin, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Simon A Gayther, Anna V Tinker, Leah M Prentice, Christine Chow, Michael S Anglesio, Sharon E Johnatty, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Alice S Whittemore, Paul DP Pharoah, Ellen L Goode, David G Huntsman, Susan J Ramus
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Infertility, infertility treatment, and achievement of pregnancy in female survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort
  • Sara E Barton, Julie S Najita, Elizabeth S Ginsburg, Wendy M Leisenring, Marilyn Stovall, Rita E Weathers, Charles A Sklar, Leslie L Robison, Lisa Diller

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.