Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy: A Randomised Trial of Factory or Echocardiographic Settings for Optimum Response - 20/09/13
: MBBS, Martin Thomas b : MD, Susan Ellery a : MBBS, Simon Jewell a, Lorraine Lee a, Rachael James a : MD, Sean O’Nunain a : MD, David Hildick-Smith a : MDRésumé |
Background |
We aimed to assess whether echocardiographically-optimised atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delay programming provided any additional benefit over standard settings following biventricular pacemaker implantation in patients with advanced heart failure.
Methods |
Paired data were collected on 22 patients (aged 67.5±8.3 years, 16 male) with refractory heart failure, NYHA class III/IV symptoms, sinus rhythm, LBBB and a broad QRS complex >120ms. All patients underwent implantation of a biventricular pacemaker and were randomised to eight weeks of factory pacing mode (Mode 1) or echocardiographically-guided pacing mode (Mode 2), followed by eight weeks in the alternate mode, in a randomised blinded crossover design.
Results |
Peak oxygen consumption, 6min walk distance, NYHA class and quality of life scores improved after biventricular pacing, but no significant difference was found between the two modes, with the exception of peak oxygen consumption score (baseline: 14.8±0.9, Mode 1: 14.6±1.2, Mode 2: 16.1±1.2mL/kg/min), which was better in Mode 2 than Mode 1 (p 0.003).
Conclusion |
Transthoracic echocardiographic optimisation of AV and VV delays following biventricular pacing may offer additional clinical benefit in an unselected group of patients when compared with factory settings.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Heart failure, Biventricular pacing, Echocardiography, Optimisation, Non-responder
Plan
Vol 22 - N° 9
P. 717-723 - septembre 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
