Validation of Diagnostic Codes for Intussusception and Quantification of Childhood Intussusception Incidence in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Study - 24/09/13
, Shelley L. Deeks, MD, MHSc, FRCPC, FAFPHM 6, 7, Steven Hawken, MSc 1, 2, 3, Dean A. Fergusson, MHA, PhD 2, 3, 8, 9, Kumanan Wilson, MD, FRCPC, MSc 1, 3, 8Abstract |
Objectives |
To validate an algorithm to identify cases of intussusception using the health administrative data of Ontario, Canada, and to apply the algorithm to estimate provincial incidence of intussusception, preceding the introduction of the universal rotavirus vaccination program.
Study design |
We determined the accuracy of various combinations of diagnostic, procedural, and billing codes using the chart-abstracted diagnoses of patients of the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario as the reference standard. We selected an algorithm that maximized positive predictive value while maintaining a high sensitivity and used it to ascertain annual incidence of intussusception for fiscal years 1995-2010. We explored temporal trends in incidence using Poisson regression.
Results |
The selected algorithm included only the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 or ICD-10 code for intussusception in the hospitalization database and was sensitive (89.3%) and highly specific (>99.9%). The positive predictive value of the ICD code was 72.4%, and the negative predictive value was >99.9%. We observed the highest mean incidence (34 per 100 000) in male children <1 year of age. Temporal trends in incidence varied by age group. There was a significant mean decrease in incidence of 4% per year in infants (<1 year) until 2004 and rates stabilized thereafter.
Conclusions |
We have demonstrated that intussusception can be accurately identified within health administrative data using validated algorithms. We have described changes in temporal trends in intussusception incidence in Ontario and established a baseline to allow ongoing monitoring as part of vaccine safety surveillance.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keyword : CHEO, CIHI-DAD, ED, FY, ICD, ICES, NACRS, OHIP, PPV
Plan
| Supported by Public Health Ontario and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). R.D. was supported by an Ontario Graduate Scholarship from the Ontario Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities. E.B. is supported by a Career Development Award from the Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program. S.H. is supported by a doctoral scholarship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). D.F. holds a New Investigator award from CIHR. K.W. is supported by the Canada Research Chair in Public Health policy. The opinions, results, and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent of the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES, the Ontario MOHLTC, or Public Health Ontario is intended or should be inferred. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
Vol 163 - N° 4
P. 1073 - octobre 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
