Frequent ED users: are most visits for mental health, alcohol, and drug-related complaints? - 05/10/13
, John T. Nagurney, MD, MPH a, Yuchiao Chang, PhD b, Blair A. Parry, CCRC, BA a, Peter Smulowitz, MD, MPH c, Steven J. Atlas, MD, MPH bAbstract |
Study objective |
To determine whether frequent emergency department (ED) users are more likely to make at least one and a majority of visits for mental health, alcohol, or drug-related complaints compared to non-frequent users.
Methods |
We performed a retrospective cohort study exploring frequent ED use and ED diagnosis at a single, academic hospital and included all ED patients between January 1 and December 31, 2010. We compared differences in ED visits with a primary International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision visit diagnosis of mental health, alcohol or drug-related diagnoses between non-frequent users (<4 visits during previous 12-months) and frequent (repeat [4-7 visits], highly frequent [8-18 visits] and super frequent [≥19 visits]) users in univariate and multivariable analyses.
Results |
Frequent users (2496/65201 [3.8%] patients) were more likely to make at least one visit associated with mental health, alcohol, or drug-related diagnoses. The proportion of patients with a majority of visits related to any of the three diagnoses increased from 5.8% among non-frequent users (3616/62705) to 9.4% among repeat users (181/1926), 13.1% among highly frequent users (62/473), and 25.8% (25/97 patients) in super frequent users. An increasing proportion of visits with alcohol-related diagnoses was observed among repeat, highly frequent, and super frequent users but was not found for mental health or drug-related complaints.
Conclusion |
Frequent ED users were more likely to make a mental health, alcohol or drug-related visit, but a majority of visits were only noted for those with alcohol-related diagnoses. To address frequent ED use, interventions focusing on managing patients with frequent alcohol-related visits may be necessary.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| ☆ | Meetings: This research has not been presented. |
| ☆☆ | Source(s) of support: Departmental funds. |
| ★ | Conflicts of interest: None. |
| ★★ | Author Contributions: SWL, JTN, YC, BAP, PS, and SJA conceived of the study, designed the study, and obtained research funding. YC provided statistical advice on study design and analyzed the data. SWL drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. SWL takes responsibility for the paper as a whole. |
Vol 31 - N° 10
P. 1512-1515 - octobre 2013 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
