Applications of Justification and Optimization in Medical Imaging: Examples of Clinical Guidance for Computed Tomography Use in Emergency Medicine - 17/12/13
, Otha W. Linton, MSJ b, E. Stephen Amis, MD c, D. Mark Courtney, MD d, Paul A. Larson, MD e, Mahadevappa Mahesh, MS, PhD f, Robert A. Novelline, MD g, Donald P. Frush, MD h, Fred A. Mettler, MD i, Julie K. Timins, MD j, Thomas S. Tenforde, MD k, John D. Boice, ScD k, James A. Brink, MD l, Jerrold T. Bushberg, MD m, David A. Schauer, ScD k, ∗Abstract |
Availability, reliability, and technical improvements have led to continued expansion of computed tomography (CT) imaging. During a CT scan, there is substantially more exposure to ionizing radiation than with conventional radiography. This has led to questions and critical conclusions about whether the continuous growth of CT scans should be subjected to review and potentially restraints or, at a minimum, closer investigation. This is particularly pertinent to populations in emergency departments, such as children and patients who receive repeated CT scans for benign diagnoses. During the last several decades, among national medical specialty organizations, the American College of Emergency Physicians and the American College of Radiology have each formed membership working groups to consider value, access, and expedience and to promote broad acceptance of CT protocols and procedures within their disciplines. Those efforts have had positive effects on the use criteria for CT by other physician groups, health insurance carriers, regulators, and legislators.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Mr. Linton was formerly affiliated with the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD. |
|
| Supervising editor: Donald M. Yealy, MD |
|
| Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org/). The authors have stated that no such relationships exist. Mr. Linton, Dr. Amis, Dr. Courtney, Dr. Larson, Dr. Mahesh, Dr. Novelline, Dr. Frush, Dr. Mettler, Dr. Timins, Dr. Tenforde, Mr. Boice, Dr. Brink, Dr. Bushberg, and Mr. Schauer report no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest. Dr. Sierzenski did not receive any funding to produce this article, has served on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Technical Expert Panels for Outpatient Imaging Efficiency Measurement, is a member of the ACEP Quality Performance Committee, and is president and chief executive officer of Emergency Ultrasound Consultants, LLC. |
|
| A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com. |
Vol 63 - N° 1
P. 25-32 - janvier 2014 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
