Developing an item bank and short forms that assess the impact of asthma on quality of life - 06/02/14
Summary |
The present work describes the process of developing an item bank and short forms that measure the impact of asthma on quality of life (QoL) that avoids confounding QoL with asthma symptomatology and functional impairment. Using a diverse national sample of adults with asthma (N = 2032) we conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and item response theory and differential item functioning analyses to develop a 65-item unidimensional item bank and separate short form assessments. A psychometric evaluation of the RAND Impact of Asthma on QoL item bank (RAND-IAQL) suggests that though the concept of asthma impact on QoL is multi-faceted, it may be measured as a single underlying construct. The performance of the bank was then evaluated with a real-data simulated computer adaptive test. From the RAND-IAQL item bank we then developed two short forms consisting of 4 and 12 items (reliability = 0.86 and 0.93, respectively). A real-data simulated computer adaptive test suggests that as few as 4–5 items from the bank are needed to obtain highly precise scores. Preliminary validity results indicate that the RAND-IAQL measures distinguish between levels of asthma control. To measure the impact of asthma on QoL, users of these items may choose from two highly reliable short forms, computer adaptive test administration, or content-specific subsets of items from the bank tailored to their specific needs.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Item response theory, Psychometrics, Health-related quality of life, Asthma, RAND-IAQL, Item bank
Abbreviations : ACT, COPD, CFA, DIF, EFA, GRM, IRT, RAND-IAQL, RMSE, NHLBI, PROMIS, QoL, wABC, WLSMV
Plan
| ☆ | Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HL10732. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. |
Vol 108 - N° 2
P. 252-263 - février 2014 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

