Left Ventricular Diastolic Function and Characteristics in Fetal Aortic Stenosis - 11/06/14
, David Schidlow, MD a, b, Lindsay Freud, MD a, b, Maria Escobar-Diaz, MD a, b, Wayne Tworetzky, MD a, bAbstract |
Fetal aortic balloon valvuloplasty (FAV) has shown promise in averting progression of midgestation aortic stenosis (AS) to hypoplastic left heart syndrome in a subset of patients. Patients who achieve biventricular circulation after FAV frequently have left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (DD). This study evaluates DD in fetuses with AS by comparing echocardiographic indices of LV diastolic function in fetuses underwent FAV (n = 20) with controls (n = 40) and evaluates for LV factors associated with DD in patients with FAV. We also compared pre-FAV and post-FAV DD variables (n = 16). Median gestational age (24 weeks, range 18 to 29 weeks) and fetal heart rate were similar between FAV and controls. Compared with controls, patients with FAV had universally abnormal LV diastolic parameters including fused mitral inflow E and A waves (p = 0.008), higher E velocity (p <0.001), shorter mitral inflow time (p = 0.001), lower LV lateral annulus E′ (p <0.001), septal E′ (p = 0.003), and higher E/E′ (p <0.001) than controls. Patients with FAV had abnormal right ventricular mechanics with higher tricuspid inflow E velocity (p <0.001) and shorter tricuspid inflow time (p = 0.03). Worse LV diastolic function (lower LV E′) was associated with higher endocardial fibroelastosis grade (r = 0.74, p <0.001), large LV volume (r = 0.55, p = 0.013), and sphericity (r = 0.58, p = 0.009) and with lower LV pressure by mitral regurgitation jet (r = −0.68, p <0.001). Post-FAV, fewer patients had fused mitral inflow E and A than pre-FAV (p = 0.05) and septal E′ was higher (=0.04). In conclusion, fetuses with midgestation AS have evidence of marked DD. Worse DD is associated with larger, more spherical LV, with more extensive endocardial fibroelastosis and lower LV pressure.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| See page 126 for disclosure information. |
Vol 114 - N° 1
P. 122-127 - juillet 2014 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
