S'abonner

Gefitinib for oesophageal cancer progressing after chemotherapy (COG): a phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial - 01/07/14

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70024-5 
Susan J Dutton, MSc a, , David R Ferry, ProfPhD b, c, Jane M Blazeby, ProfMD d, e, Haider Abbas, MRCP b, Asa Dahle-Smith, MBChB f, Wasat Mansoor, PhD g, Joyce Thompson, FRCP h, Mark Harrison, PhD i, Anirban Chatterjee, FRCR j, Stephen Falk, MD d, Angel Garcia-Alonso, MD k, David W Fyfe, MD l, Richard A Hubner, PhD g, Tina Gamble h, Lynnda Peachey, BSc m, Mina Davoudianfar, BA m, Sarah R Pearson, BSc m, Patrick Julier, MSc m, Janusz Jankowski, ProfPhD n, Rachel Kerr, MD m, Russell D Petty, MRCP f
a Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit and Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK 
b Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK 
c Lilly UK, Erl Wood Manor, Windlesham, UK 
d University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK 
e School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol Senate House, Bristol, UK 
f University of Aberdeen, Institute of Medical Sciences, Aberdeen, UK 
g Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK 
h Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK 
i Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK 
j Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, UK 
k North Wales Cancer Centre, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Rhyl, UK 
l University Hospitals of Morecombe Bay, Furness General Hospital, Barrow-in-Furness, UK 
m Oncology Clinical Trials Office, University of Oxford, Department of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK 
n Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK 

* Correspondence to: Mrs Susan J Dutton, Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit and Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK

Summary

Background

Evidence is scarce for the effectiveness of therapies for oesophageal cancer progressing after chemotherapy, and no randomised trials have been reported. We aimed to compare gefitinib with placebo in previously treated advanced oesophageal cancer.

Methods

For this phase 3, parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, eligible patients were adults with advanced oesophageal cancer or type I/II Siewert junctional tumours, histologically confirmed squamous-cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, who had progressed after chemotherapy, with WHO performance status 0–2, and with measurable or evaluable disease on CT scan. Participants were recruited from 48 UK centres and randomly assigned (1:1) to gefitinib (500 mg) or matching placebo by simple randomisation with no stratification factors. Patients, clinicians, and trial office staff were masked to treatment allocation. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient choice. The primary outcome was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN29580179.

Findings

Between March 30, 2009, and Nov 18, 2011, 450 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (one patient withdrew consent; 224 patients allocated gefitinib and 225 allocated placebo included in analyses). Overall survival did not differ between groups (median 3·73 months, 95% CI 3·23–4·50, for gefitinib vs 3·67 months, 95% CI 2·97–4·37, for placebo; hazard ratio [HR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·74–1·09, p=0·29). Among the prespecified patient-reported outcomes (110 patients on gefitinib and 121 on placebo completed both baseline and 4 week questionnaires and were included in analyses), odynophagia was significantly better in the gefitinib group (adjusted mean difference −8·61, 95% CI −14·49 to −2·73; n=227; p=0·004), whereas the other outcomes were not significantly improved compared with placebo: global quality of life (2·69, 95% CI −2·33 to 7·72, n=231, p=0·293), dysphagia (−3·18, 95% CI −8·36 to 2·00, n=231, p=0·228), and eating (−4·11, 95% CI −9·96 to 1·75, n=229, p=0·168). Median progression-free survival was marginally longer with gefitinib than it was with placebo (1·57 months, 95% CI 1·23–1·90 in the gefitinib group vs 1·17 months, 95% CI 1·07–1·37 in the placebo group; HR 0·80, 95% CI 0·66–0·96, p=0·020). The most common toxicities were diarrhoea (36 [16%] of 224 patients on gefitinib vs six [3%] of 225 on placebo) and skin toxicity (46 [21%] vs two [1%]), both mostly grade 2. The commonest grade 3–4 toxicities were fatigue (24 [11%] vs 13 [6%] patients) and diarrhoea (13 [6%] vs two [1%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 109 (49%) of 224 patients assigned to gefitinib and 101 (45%) of 225 on placebo. 54 (24%) of patients in the gefitinib group achieved disease control at 8 weeks, as did 35 (16%) of patients on placebo (p=0·023).

Interpretation

The use of gefitinib as a second-line treatment in oesophageal cancer in unselected patients does not improve overall survival, but has palliative benefits in a subgroup of these difficult-to-treat patients with short life expectancy. Future research should focus on identification of predictive biomarkers to identify this subgroup of benefiting patients.

Funding

Cancer Research UK.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2014  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 15 - N° 8

P. 894-904 - juillet 2014 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Sequential paclitaxel followed by tegafur and uracil (UFT) or S-1 versus UFT or S-1 monotherapy as adjuvant chemotherapy for T4a/b gastric cancer (SAMIT): a phase 3 factorial randomised controlled trial
  • Akira Tsuburaya, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Michiya Kobayashi, Shigefumi Yoshino, Masazumi Takahashi, Nobuhiro Takiguchi, Kazuaki Tanabe, Naoto Takahashi, Hiroshi Imamura, Naokuni Tatsumoto, Akinori Hara, Kazuhiro Nishikawa, Ryoji Fukushima, Isao Nozaki, Hiroshi Kojima, Yumi Miyashita, Koji Oba, Marc Buyse, Satoshi Morita, Junichi Sakamoto
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Drug–drug interactions with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: a clinical perspective
  • Roelof W F van Leeuwen, Teun van Gelder, Ron H J Mathijssen, Frank G A Jansman

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.