Four-Factor Structure of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Symptoms in Children, Adolescents, and Adults - 26/07/14

Disclosure: Dr. Geller has received research support from, has been a speaker for, or has served on the advisory boards of Shire, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Forest Laboratories, and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Carter receives royalties from Harcourt Assessment for the ITSEA/BITSEA measures she codeveloped. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.
Abstract |
Objective |
To determine whether the four-factor category-based obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptom structure from a previous confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) may be appropriately used in child, adolescent, and adult groups. Symptom dimensions are increasingly used as quantitative traits in genetic, neuroimaging, and treatment studies of OCD across all ages. Identification of a category-based OCD symptom dimension structure that is validated for use across child, adolescent, and adult age groups is necessary to guide ongoing translational research.
Method |
Four OCD samples comprising 356 individuals were divided into child, adolescent, and adult groups. The fit of the only CFA-defined four-factor model was compared across these independent age group samples. Multiple-group CFA using maximum likelihood estimation assessed adequacy of fit comparing unconstrained and measurement weight-constrained models. The fit of previous exploratory factor analysis-defined three- and five-factor models on adults was also examined using CFA.
Results |
A four-factor solution provided adequate but imperfect fit across age groups, with comparable indices to the only previous OCD CFA: factor 1 (aggressive/sexual/religious/somatic/checking); factor 2 (symmetry/ordering/counting/repeating); factor 3 (contamination/cleaning), and factor 4 (hoarding). Models in which factor loadings were constrained and unconstrained across the three age groups yielded comparable model fit. Factors were highly correlated and were not mutually exclusive. The four-factor solution provided an improved fit to both three- and five-factor solutions using CFA across the three age groups.
Conclusions |
A four-factor, CFA-defined, category-based model of OCD symptom dimensions is adequate for use in children, adolescents, and adult age groups. The factor structure of this multiple age group sample has limitations and is imperfect, but current findings support the comparability of the defined latent OCD dimensions across age groups. Further work is needed to optimize a comprehensive symptom dimension model reflecting clinical heterogeneity for use in emergent translational studies. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 2008; 47(7):763–772.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key Words : obsessive-compulsive disorder, age, factor analysis, symptom dimension, quantitative trait
Plan
| Reviewed and accepted by Deputy Editor John Walkup, M.D. Grant support was provided by the Obsessive-Compulsive Foundation (S.E.S., M.C.R., D.AG.); McIngvale Foundation (S.E.S., D.L.P., D.A.G.); Harvard Scholar in Medicine Award (S.E.S.); CIHR Postgraduate Fellowship (S.E.S.); University of Ottawa International Fellowship (S.E.S.); Tourette Syndrome Association (M.C.R.); NIMH-K08-MH01481 (D.A.G.); NINDS-R01-NS16648 (D.L.P.) and MH49351 (J.F.L.). The authors thank Erin Hendrickson and Casey Walsh for their assistance with manuscript preparation and the reviewers for their valuable feedback. This article is the subject of an editorial by Drs. Marc Riddle and Marco Grados in this issue. |
Vol 47 - N° 7
P. 763-772 - juillet 2008 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
