Correlation Among Lens Opacities Classification System III Grading, Visual Function Index-14, Pentacam Nucleus Staging, and Objective Scatter Index for Cataract Assessment - 25/12/14

Abstract |
Purpose |
To investigate the relationship among Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III) grading score, Visual Function Index-14 (VF-14) score, average lens density by the Pentacam Nucleus Staging system, and the objective scatter index measured by the Optical Quality Analysis System in age-related cataract patients.
Design |
Prospective, single-center, cross-sectional study.
Methods |
Thirty-six subjects (60 eyes) with age-related cataract were recruited. Subjects with any corneal anomaly potentially affecting intraocular scatter were excluded. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), LOCS III nuclear opalescence score and cortical cataract score, VF-14 score, average lens density, and objective scatter index were obtained. Correlations among these parameters were analyzed.
Results |
The LOCS III nuclear opalescence score was correlated with the BCVA (r = 0.438; P = .001), objective scatter index (r = 0.543; P < .001), and average lens density (r = 0.621; P < .001). The objective scatter index was also correlated with the BCVA (r = 0.779; P < .001) and the average lens density (r = 0.320; P = .013). The VF-14 score had the strongest correlation with the objective scatter index (r = −0.712; P < .001). The difference between groups with objective scatter index<3.0 and ≥3.0 was significant with regard to BCVA, average lens density, LOCS III nuclear opalescence score, and VF-14 score.
Conclusions |
LOCS III grading remains an economical and effective method to assess lens opacities, especially in the formation of early cortex cataracts. The objective scatter index can be a useful parameter to objectively analyze the correlation between ocular examination findings and patient concerns. Furthermore, the objective scatter index scores ≥3.0 can be a possible objective cut-off for preoperative decision making.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 159 - N° 2
P. 241 - février 2015 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
