Prognostic Comparison of Different Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays in Stable Heart Failure - 23/02/15

Abstract |
Background |
Cardiac troponin (cTn) levels offer prognostic information for patients with heart failure. Highly sensitive assays detect levels of cTn much lower than the 99th percentile of standard cTn assays. We hypothesize that cardiac troponin levels measured by a high-sensitivity assay provide better prognostic value compared with cTn levels measured by a standard assay in patients with chronic heart failure.
Methods |
We measured high-sensitivity cTnT (hs-cTnT) and standard cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels, as well as amino-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in 504 sequential stable patients with a history of heart failure who underwent elective coronary angiography, without acute coronary syndrome, and with 5-year follow-up of all-cause mortality.
Results |
The median hs-cTnT level was 21.2 (interquartile range 12.3-40.9) ng/L and 170 subjects died over 5 years. In a head-to-head overall comparison, hs-cTnT provided increased prognostic utility compared with cTnI (area under the curve [AUC] 66.1% and AUC 69.4%, respectively, P = .03; 9.0% integrated discrimination improvement, P < .001; and 13.6% event-specific reclassification, P < .001), and was independent of NT-proBNP and renal function. Even within the subset of patients where cTn levels by both assays were above the limit of quantification, higher hs-cTnT is associated with a 2-fold increase in 5-year mortality risk after adjusting for traditional risk factors (tertile 1 vs 3: hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.0 [1.3-3.2]; P = .0002).
Conclusion |
Cardiac troponin can be detected by the high-sensitivity assay in more patients with chronic heart failure than the standard assay, and may yield independent and better prognostic accuracy for mortality prediction than standard assay.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Cardiac troponin, Heart failure, High-sensitivity cardiac troponin, Prognosis
Plan
| Funding: WHWT is supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01HL103931, P20HL113452 (with Office of Dietary Supplements), P01HL076491, P01HL098055, R01HL103931, and UL1TR 000439. |
|
| Conflicts of Interest: SLH is named as co-inventor on pending patents held by the Cleveland Clinic relating to cardiovascular diagnostics. SLH reports having been paid as a consultant for the following companies: Abbott Diagnostics, Cleveland Heart Lab, Esperion, Lilly, Liposcience Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., P&G, and Pfizer Inc. SLH reports receiving research funds from Abbott, Cleveland Heart Lab, Liposcience Inc., P&G, and Pfizer Inc. SLH reports having the right to receive royalty payments for inventions or discoveries related to cardiovascular diagnostics or therapeutics from the companies shown below: Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Cleveland Heart Lab., Esperion, Frantz Biomarkers, LLC, Liposcience Inc., and Siemens. All other authors (JLG, SN, and WHWT) have no relationships to disclose. |
|
| Authorship: All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript. |
Vol 128 - N° 3
P. 276-282 - mars 2015 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
