Is Rhythm Control Better Than Rate Control for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department? - 23/04/15
Doi : 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.030
Rohith R. Malya, MD, MSc : EBEM Commentator
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, TX
Latha Ganti, MD, MS : EBEM Commentator
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Central Florida, Gainesville, FL
North Florida-South Georgia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lake City, FL
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.
Plan
| Editor's Note: This is a clinical synopsis, a regular feature of the Annals’ Systematic Review Snapshot (SRS) series. The source for this systematic review is: Chatterjee S, Sardar P, Lichstein E, et al. Pharmacologic rate versus rhythm-control strategies in atrial fibrillation: an updated comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36:122-133. |
|
| Michael Brown, MD, MSc, Alan Jones, MD, and David Newman, MD, serve as editors of the SRS series. |
© 2015
American College of Emergency Physicians. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Vol 65 - N° 5
P. 540-542 - mai 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Managing Atrial Fibrillation
- Clare L. Atzema, Tyler W. Barrett
- Do Mechanical Devices Improve Return of Spontaneous Circulation Over Manual Chest Compressions in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest?
- Ambrose H. Wong, Anand Swaminathan, Alex Koyfman
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?