Obesity Bias, Medical Technology, and the Hormonal Hypothesis: Should We Stop Demonizing Fat People? - 24/04/15
, John E. Hall, PhD c, d, Leigh Baldwin Skipworth, BA aAbstract |
There is adequate evidence to demonstrate that bias toward obese individuals by health professionals is common. Bias predisposes to errors in medical judgment and care. There is also evidence to show that the pathophysiology of obesity is more complex than eating too much and moving too little. Widespread obesity is a new phenomenon in the United States and reflects changes in culture, including food, at many levels. The modern abundance of low-cost, available, palatable, energy-dense processed foods and the ability of these foods to activate central nervous system centers that drive food preference and overeating appear to play an important role in the obesity epidemic. The usual hormonal systems that promote body weight homeostasis appear to have been counterbalanced by pleasurable (hedonic) influences these foods generate in higher neurologic networks, including the limbic system. The use of medical technology, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging, to quantitate hedonic responses to food, enhance taste, and effectively develop and market commercial food products has produced new areas of ethical concern and opportunities to better understand eating and satiety. These developments further demonstrate the urgency to address the bias that exists toward obese patients.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Bias, Hormonal hypothesis, Obesity
Plan
| Funding: None. |
|
| Conflict of Interest: None. |
|
| Authorship: All authors had access to the data and played a role in writing this manuscript. |
Vol 128 - N° 5
P. 456-460 - mai 2015 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
