S'abonner

Secukinumab retreatment-as-needed versus fixed-interval maintenance regimen for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial (SCULPTURE) - 17/06/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.011 
Ulrich Mrowietz, MD a, , Craig L. Leonardi, MD b, Giampiero Girolomoni, MD c, Darryl Toth, MD, FRCPC d, Akimichi Morita, MD e, Shyamal A. Balki, FCPS f, Jacek C. Szepietowski, MD g, Pascaline Regnault, PhD h, Helen Thurston, MSc h, Charis Papavassilis, MD h
for the

SCULPTURE Study Group

a Psoriasis Center, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany 
b Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 
c Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy 
d XLR8 Medical Research, Windsor, Ontario, Canada 
e Department of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan 
f Shree Hospital and Critical Care Center, Nagpur, India 
g Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland 
h Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland 

Correspondence to: Ulrich Mrowietz, MD, Psoriasis Center, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Schittenhelmstr. 7, Kiel 24105, Germany.

Abstract

Background

Secukinumab has demonstrated high, sustained efficacy in psoriasis to 52 weeks on a fixed-interval regimen.

Objective

We sought to compare a retreatment-as-needed versus a fixed-interval regimen.

Methods

In this double-blind study, adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous secukinumab at 300 mg (n = 484) or 150 mg (n = 482) weekly from baseline until week 4, and at week 8. At week 12, patients achieving 75% or more improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) were rerandomized to 2 dose levels of secukinumab retreatment as needed (n = 217, 300 mg; n = 206, 150 mg) or fixed interval (n = 217; n = 203). Primary end point was noninferiority of retreatment as needed versus fixed interval for maintaining PASI 75 to week 52.

Results

Secukinumab induced high responses by week 12 (84.4%-91.1% PASI 75 responders). From week 12 to week 52, more patients on fixed interval (78.2%, 300 mg; 62.1%, 150 mg) maintained PASI 75 versus retreatment as needed (67.7%; 52.4%); statistical noninferiority of retreatment as needed was not established. Overall safety, including very low incidences of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (<0.5%), was similar between regimens.

Limitations

The primary end point was developed without any known precedent.

Conclusion

Secukinumab fixed interval showed clear benefit versus the study-specified retreatment-as-needed regimen for maintaining efficacy. Both regimens exhibited safety consistent with previous trials. The potential of retreatment as needed with secukinumab warrants further investigation.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : clinical trial, dosing, immunogenicity, noninferiority, psoriasis, retreatment as needed, secukinumab

Abbreviations used : AE, DLQI, IGA, PASI, PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100, QOL, SCULPTURE, STATURE


Plan


 Study funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. It was designed by the scientific steering committee and Novartis personnel. Investigators collected data, Novartis conducted data analyses, and all authors had access to data. The initial draft of the manuscript was written by a medical writer compensated by Novartis. All authors had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
 Disclosure: The authors received writing and editorial support from Barry Weichman and Jinling Wu in the preparation of the manuscript from BioScience Communications, New York, NY, supported by Novartis. Dr Mrowietz has served as advisor and/or received speaker honoraria and/or received grants and/or participated in clinical trials for Abbott/AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, BASF, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Centocor, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Medac, MSD, Miltenyi Biotech, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva, VBL, and Xenoport. Dr Leonardi has served as consultant and/or investigator and/or participated in a speaker's bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Stiefel, and UCB. Dr Girolomoni has received advisory/speaker honoraria and/or research funding from AbbVie, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dompé, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Merck Serono, Maruho, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer. Dr Toth has served as investigator for Novartis, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Abbott, Celgene, Merck, Galderma, and Leo Pharma. Dr Morita has served as consultant and/or paid speaker for and/or participated in psoriasis clinical trials sponsored by AbbVie, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Janssen, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Kyowa-Kirin, Leo Pharma, Maruho, and MSD. Dr Szepietowski has served as advisor and/or received speakers honoraria and/or participated in clinical trials for Abbott/AbbVie, Actavis, Amgen, BASF, Astellas, Berlin-Chemie/Menarini, Biogenetica International Laboratories, Centocor, Fresenius, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Takeda, Toray Corporation, and Vichy. Dr Regnault, Ms Thurston, and Dr Papavassilis are employees of and/or own stock in Novartis. Dr Balki has no conflicts of interest to declare.
 Reprints not available from the authors.


© 2015  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 73 - N° 1

P. 27 - juillet 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Change of Address
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results of a phase III, randomized, controlled trial (Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of Apremilast in Psoriasis [ESTEEM] 1)
  • Kim Papp, Kristian Reich, Craig L. Leonardi, Leon Kircik, Sergio Chimenti, Richard G.B. Langley, ChiaChi Hu, Randall M. Stevens, Robert M. Day, Kenneth B. Gordon, Neil J. Korman, Christopher E.M. Griffiths

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.