S'abonner

A retrospective review of required projects in systems-based practice in a single anesthesiology residency: a 10-year experience - 04/08/15

Doi : 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.06.009 
Tetsuro Sakai, MD, PhD a,  : Professor, Trent D. Emerick, MD b  : Fellow, Rita M. Patel, MD c, d  : Professor & Vice-Chair of Education, Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education, Designated Institutional Official
a Anesthesiology and the Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 
b Division of Chronic Pain, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 
c Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 
d UPMC Medical Education, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 

Corresponding author. Anesthesiology and the Clinical and Translational Science Institute & The McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Montefiore, M469.11, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Tel.: +1 412 648 6077; fax: +1 412 648 6014.
Sous presse. Épreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le Tuesday 04 August 2015

Abstract

Study Objective

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has emphasized in its core competencies and more recently, in its Milestones Project, that residents understand the importance of systems-based practice (SBP). The objectives of the study are to evaluate the quality of residents' SBP projects and to determine the degrees that were subsequently implemented.

Design

A retrospective educational observational study.

Setting

A university-based anesthesiology training institution.

Subjects

One hundred forty-nine anesthesiology residents in their final (postgraduate year 4) year of training who completed SBP projects for the last 10 years (2004-2013).

Interventions

A structured SBP course was provided for postgraduate year 4 anesthesiology residents with deadlines set such as project identification, data collection, and proposal draft. Each resident's written SBP proposal received inputs by 2 members of the department executive steering committee. The SBP projects concluded with oral presentations by each resident to the department executive steering committee, who provided overall scores.

Measurements

All SBP projects were categorized into 7 categories: safety initiatives, economic analysis, process analysis, policy change recommendations, education initiatives, teamwork/communication, and operating room efficiency. Evaluation scores using a Likert scale (1-9, where 9 is the best) were analyzed. The rate of implementation of project ideas within the department based on the presentations to the executive committee was examined.

Main Results

Of 149 projects, policy change recommendations was the most frequently chosen category (46 projects; 30.9%), followed by process analysis (36 projects; 24.2%). The overall evaluation score was 7.6 ± 0.6 (mean ± SD). A total of 53 projects (35.6%) were implemented in the department. There was no statistical difference between SBPs with implementation vs SBPs without implementation in terms of evaluation scores, year of the presentation, or categories.

Conclusions

This SBP project has given residents the opportunity to participate in a hospital system change aiming to improve efficiency and safety.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Systems-based practice (SBP) is 1 of 6 core competencies by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.
This study provides a long-term (10 years) result of SBP project.
Policy change recommendation was the most frequently chosen category.
35.6% of SBP projects were implemented in the department.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Medical education, Medical education systems-based practice, Outcomes, Professionalism


Plan


 Funding support: The authors report no external funding source for this study.
☆☆ Competing interests: The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest. R.M.P. was a past member of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) review committee for anesthesiology and a current member of the ACGME institutional committee. The opinions expressed in the manuscript are not the ones of ACGME.
 Authors' contributions: R.M.P. developed the program and maintained the data. T.E.M. and T.S. collected and analyzed the data. T.S. and T.E.M. wrote the draft. All authors reviewed the final draft and agreed the content.
★★ Previous presentations: The study has been presented, in part, as a podium presentation at the 2015 Spring Annual Meeting of the Society for Education in Anesthesia and the Association of Surgical Educators (Seattle, WA; April 24-26, 2015) and as a poster form at The 2015 Annual Meeting of the International Anesthesia Research Society (Honolulu, Hawaii; March 21-24, 2015).


© 2015  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.