S'abonner

Adjuvant lymph-node field radiotherapy versus observation only in patients with melanoma at high risk of further lymph-node field relapse after lymphadenectomy (ANZMTG 01.02/TROG 02.01): 6-year follow-up of a phase 3, randomised controlled trial - 01/09/15

Doi : 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00187-4 
Michael A Henderson, ProfMD a, d, , , Bryan H Burmeister, ProfMD e, , Jill Ainslie, FRANZCR c, Richard Fisher, PhD b, Juliana Di Iulio, PhD b, B Mark Smithers, ProfFRACS e, Angela Hong, PhD f, Kerwin Shannon, FRACS f, Richard A Scolyer, ProfMD f, Scott Carruthers, FRANZCR g, Brendon J Coventry, ProfFRACS g, Scott Babington, FRANZCR h, Joao Duprat, PhD i, Harald J Hoekstra, ProfMD j, John F Thompson, ProfMD f
a Division of Cancer Surgery, University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia 
b Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia 
c Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia 
d University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia 
e Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia 
f Melanoma Institute of Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia 
g Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia 
h Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand 
i Hospital Do Cancer, Sao Paulo, Brazil 
j University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands 

* Correspondence to: Prof Michael A Henderson, Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia Correspondence to: Prof Michael A Henderson Division of Cancer Surgery Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre East Melbourne VIC 3002 Australia

Summary

Background

Adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended for patients with melanoma after lymphadenectomy. We previously showed this treatment reduced risk of repeat lymph-node field cancer in patients with a high risk of recurrence but had no effect on overall survival. Here, we aim to update the relapse and survival data from that trial and assess quality of life and toxic effects.

Methods

In the ANZMTG 01.02/TROG 02.01 randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients who had undergone lymphadenectomy for a palpable lymph-node field relapse and were at high risk of recurrence at 16 hospitals (11 in Australia, three in New Zealand, one in Netherlands, and one in Brazil). We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to adjuvant radiotherapy (48 Gy in 20 fractions, given over a maximum of 30 days) or observation, stratified by institution, areas of lymph-node field (parotid and cervical, axilla, or groin), number of involved nodes (≤3 vs >3), maximum involved node diameter (≤4 cm vs >4 cm), and extent of extracapsular extension (none, limited, or extensive). Participants, those giving treatment, and those assessing outcomes were not masked to treatment allocation, but participants were unaware of each other’s treatment allocation. In this follow-up, we assessed outcomes every 3 months from randomisation for the first 2 years, then every 6 months up to 5 years, then annually. The primary endpoint was lymph-node field relapse as a first relapse, assessed in patients without major eligibility infringements (determined by an independent data monitoring committee). We assessed late adverse effects (occurring >90 days after surgery or start of radiotherapy) with standard criteria in the as-treated population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00287196.

Findings

Between March 21, 2003, and Nov 15, 2007, we randomly assigned 123 patients to adjuvant radiotherapy (109 eligible for efficacy assessments) and 127 to observation (108 eligible). The final follow-up date was Nov 15, 2011. Median follow-up was 73 months (IQR 61–91). 23 (21%) relapses occurred in the adjuvant radiotherapy group compared with 39 (36%) in the observation group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·52 [95% CI 0·31–0·88], p=0·023). Overall survival (HR 1·27 [95% CI 0·89–1·79], p=0·21) and relapse-free survival (0·89 [0·65–1·22], p=0·51) did not differ between groups. Minor, long-term toxic effects from radiotherapy (predominantly pain, and fibrosis of the skin or subcutaneous tissue) were common, and 20 (22%) of 90 patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy developed grade 3–4 toxic effects. 18 (20%) of 90 patients had grade 3 toxic effects, mainly affecting skin (nine [10%] patients) and subcutaneous tissue (six [7%] patients). Over 5 years, a significant increase in lower limb volumes was noted after adjuvant radiotherapy (mean volume ratio 15·0%) compared with observation (7·7%; difference 7·3% [95% CI 1·5–13·1], p=0·014). No significant differences in upper limb volume were noted between groups.

Interpretation

Long-term follow-up supports our previous findings. Adjuvant radiotherapy could be useful for patients for whom lymph-node field control is a major issue, but entry to an adjuvant systemic therapy trial might be a preferable first option. Alternatively, observation, reserving surgery and radiotherapy for a further recurrence, might be an acceptable strategy.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Cancer Council Australia, Melanoma Institute Australia, and the Cancer Council South Australia.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2015  Elsevier Ltd. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 16 - N° 9

P. 1049-1060 - septembre 2015 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant bevacizumab in early breast cancer (NSABP B-40 [NRG Oncology]): secondary outcomes of a phase 3, randomised controlled trial
  • Harry D Bear, Gong Tang, Priya Rastogi, Charles E Geyer, Qing Liu, André Robidoux, Luis Baez-Diaz, Adam M Brufsky, Rita S Mehta, Louis Fehrenbacher, James A Young, Francis M Senecal, Rakesh Gaur, Richard G Margolese, Paul T Adams, Howard M Gross, Joseph P Costantino, Soonmyung Paik, Sandra M Swain, Eleftherios P Mamounas, Norman Wolmark
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Endometrial cancer and oral contraceptives: an individual participant meta-analysis of 27?276 women with endometrial cancer from 36 epidemiological studies
  • Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies on Endometrial Cancer †

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.