0082: Is it really possible to predict adverse event in patients with a preex-citation syndrome? - 12/02/16

Riassunto |
Purpose |
of study to collect history of patients with preexcitation syndrome (PS)-related adverse event (AE) and evaluate their risk factors. Classicaly male sex, multiple accessory pathways (AP) and at electrophysiological study (EPS), refractory period (RP)<250ms and shortest RR interval during atrial fibrillation (AF)<250ms are signs of risk of AE.
Methods |
AE occurred in 83 among a population of 970 patients consecutively recruited for a PS (8.5%) (resuscitated sudden death (n=8), or documented AF conducted with a rapid rate over AP (>300 bpm), cause of syncope and requiring cardioversion (17) or drug (58). ECG, Holter monitoring and EPS in control state (CS) and after isoproterenol were performed.
Results |
Patients with AE were older than remaining patients (40±8.5 vs 33±17) (p 0.0002). Male gender did not differ significantly (71 vs 61%)(p 0.06). ECG in sinus rhythm was normal or near normal in 20 patients with AE (24%) more frequently than in patients without AE (9%)(p 0.0001). Intermittent PS was seen only in patients without AE. At EPS atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) was induced as frequently in patients with AE as in patients without AE (60% vs 53.5%)(0.22). All other electrophysiological data differ significantly (p 0.0001): maximal rate conducted over AP was more rapid in patients with AE (262±50 bpm vs 183±65 in CS, 302±39 vs 228.5±69 after isoproterenol). AP effective refractory period was shorter in patients with AE (232±34 vs 292±73 in CS, 197±29 vs 232±50ms after isoproterenol); AF was induced more frequently in patients with AE (72 vs 19.5%). Signs of malignancy at EPS were noted in all but 4 patients (sensitivity 95%).
Conclusion |
If electrophysiological data evaluated in CS and after isoproterenol have high sensitivity (95%) to predict PS-related adverse event, the detection of PS can be difficult. In 20% of patients who presented with an adverse event, the diagnosis of PS was not made because ECG in sinus rhythm was normal.
Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.Vol 8 - N° 1
P. 67 - gennaio 2016 Ritorno al numeroBenvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.
Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?
