Precise implant alignment is a crucial prognostic factor in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Portable navigation systems (PN-TKA) were reported to be better than the conventional technique (CON-TKA). We hypothesized that PN-TKA offered greater radiologic precision than CON-TKA in mechanically aligning components. We investigated whether (1) it improved global mechanical alignment, and (2) optimized component placement with respect to the tibial and femoral mechanical axes.

A systematic literature review compared PN-TKA versus CON-TKA. PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library search retrieved ten studies. Their data were pooled using RevMan 5.3. Odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous data were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed as I² using a standard χ² test. I²>50% denoted significant heterogeneity requiring a random effects model; otherwise, a fixed effects model was applied.

There were significantly fewer outliers for mechanical axis (I²=24%, OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.42–0.91, p=0.02) and coronal femoral component angle (I²=58%, OR=0.31, 95% CI=0.13–0.73, p=0.007) using PN-TKA; however, no significant difference was observed for coronal tibial component angle outliers (I²=0%, OR=0.66, 95% CI=0.38–1.15, p=0.14).

Although PN-TKA appeared to improve global alignment, it had no effect on coronal tibial alignment, which is a key factor in predicting the long-term success of component fixation. There thus appeared to be no definite advantage of PN-TKA over CON-TKA.

III.