Abbonarsi

Improving diagnostic accuracy and appropriate indications for surgery in pancreatic cystic neoplasms: the role of EUS - 15/09/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2022.05.009 
Fabio Giannone, MD 1, 2, Stefano Crippa, MD, PhD 1, 3, , Francesca Aleotti, MD 1, Diego Palumbo, MD 4, Giulio Belfiori, MD 1, Stefano Partelli, MD, PhD 1, 3, Marco Schiavo Lena, MD 5, Gabriele Capurso, MD, PhD 6, Maria Chiara Petrone, MD 6, Francesco De Cobelli, MD 3, 4, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, MD 3, 6, Massimo Falconi, MD 1, 3
1 Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy 
6 Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy 
4 Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, Radiology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy 
5 Department of Pathology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy 
2 Department of General, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France 
3 Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy 

Reprint requests: Stefano Crippa MD, PhD, Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.Division of Pancreatic SurgeryPancreas Translational and Clinical Research CenterIRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteVia Olgettina, 60Milan20132Italy

Abstract

Background and Aims

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) represent a difficult preoperative diagnosis despite improvements in imaging. In this study, we compared preoperative and final pathologic diagnosis in a large cohort of resected PCNs, evaluating diagnostic accuracy with a specific focus on the value of EUS.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing resection between 2009 and 2019 for presumed PCNs was performed. Preoperative workup was reviewed by analyzing the role of imaging and EUS. Patients with a benign histology who did not show absolute indication were categorized as “delayable surgery.”

Results

Of 585 patients who were retrospectively analyzed, in 108 (18.5%) final histology did not confirm preoperative diagnosis. EUS was associated with a lower rate of incorrect diagnosis (16%; P = .03), but the risk of overtreatment was similar regardless of instrumental diagnostic path (33/131 vs 68/328, P = .298). Dilatation of the main pancreatic duct and cytologic sampling were the only variables independently associated with a correct diagnosis (P < .001 and P = .041, respectively). Based on clinical presentation and final histology, pancreatic resection could have been spared or delayed in 101 of 459 patients (22%), and this was influenced by age (odds ratio [OR], .97; P = .002), cyst larger than 30 mm (OR, 1.89; P = .005), and type of operation (OR, 3.46 [P < .001] and 3.18 [P = .023] for distal pancreatectomies and other resections, respectively).

Conclusions

The overall risk of unnecessary immediate surgery for PCNs is about 22% in a high-volume referral center. EUS with cytologic sampling is a useful procedure in the diagnostic management of PCNs, improving their diagnostic accuracy.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : DP, HR, HRS, IPMN, MCN, MPD, MRI, PCN, PD, SCA, SPN, TP, WF


Mappa


 DISCLOSURE: The following authors received research support for this study from the Nadia Valsecchi Foundation: S. Crippa; from FCSR-Fronzaroli: F. Aleotti; and from the Gioja Bianca Costanza Fund: G. Belfiori. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.
 See CME section, p. 678.


© 2022  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 96 - N° 4

P. 648 - ottobre 2022 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • “Fast and furious”: Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision for treatment of dumping syndrome?
  • Dilhana S. Badurdeen, Vivek Kumbhari, Victoria Gómez
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Comparison of cold snare and hot snare polypectomy for the resection of sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas
  • Mehul Trivedi, Robert Klapheke, Fady Youssef, Scott Wolfe, Lily Jih, Michael A. Chang, Syed Abbas Fehmi, Mary L. Krinsky, Wilson Kwong, Thomas Savides, Gobind S. Anand

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.