Abbonarsi

Validation of artificial intelligence–based bowel preparation assessment in screening colonoscopy (with video) - 16/10/24

Doi : 10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.015 
Liwen Yao 1, 2, ∗, Huizhen Xiong 1, ∗, Qiucheng Li 1, ∗, Wen Wang 2, 3, 4, Zhifeng Wu 2, 3, 4, Xia Tan 2, 3, 4, Chaijie Luo 2, 3, 4, Hang You 2, 3, 4, Chenxia Zhang 2, 3, 4, Lihui Zhang 2, 3, 4, Zihua Lu 2, 3, 4, Honggang Yu 2, 3, 4, ⁎ , Honglei Chen 1, ⁎
1 Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China 
2 Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China 
3 Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China 
4 Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China 

∗Reprint requests: Professor Honglei Chen, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518033, Guangdong Province, China.Gastrointestinal Endoscopy CenterThe Eighth Affiliated HospitalSun Yat-sen UniversityShenzhenGuangdong Province518033China∗∗Professor Honggang Yu, Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei Province, China.Department of GastroenterologyRenmin Hospital of Wuhan UniversityWuhanHubei Province430060China

Abstract

Background and Aims

Accurate bowel preparation assessment is essential for determining colonoscopy screening intervals. Patients with suboptimal bowel preparation are at a high risk of missing >5 mm adenomas and should undergo an early repeat colonoscopy. In this study, we used artificial intelligence (AI) to evaluate bowel preparation and validated the ability of the system to accurately identify patients who are at high risk of having >5 mm adenomas missed due to inadequate bowel preparation.

Methods

This prospective, single-center, observational study was conducted at the Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, from October 8, 2021, to November 9, 2022. Eligible patients who underwent screening colonoscopy were consecutively enrolled. The AI assessed bowel preparation using the e-Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (e-BBPS) while endoscopists made evaluations using BBPS. If both BBPS and e-BBPS deemed preparation adequate, the patient immediately underwent a second colonoscopy; otherwise, the patient underwent bowel re-cleansing before the second colonoscopy.

Results

Among the 393 patients, 72 adenomas >5 mm in size were detected; 27 adenomas >5 mm in size were missed. In unqualified-AI patients, the >5 mm adenoma miss rate (AMR) was significantly higher than in qualified-AI patients (35.71% vs 13.19% [P = .0056]; odds ratio [OR], .2734 [95% CI, .1139-.6565]), as were the AMR (50.89% vs 20.79% [P < .001]; OR, .2532 [95% CI, .1583-.4052]) and >5 mm polyp miss rate (35.82% vs 19.48% [P = .0152]; OR, .4335 [95% CI, .2288-.8213]).

Conclusions

This study confirmed that patients classified as inadequate by AI exhibited an unacceptable >5 mm AMR, providing key evidence for implementing AI in guiding bowel re-cleansing and potentially standardizing future colonoscopy screening. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05145712.)

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations : ADR, AI, AMR, AMR-IBP, AMR-UNE, BBPS, CI, CRC, DCNN, e-BBPS, OR, PDR, PMR


Mappa


 DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION: We worked to ensure gender balance in the recruitment of human subjects. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we actively worked to promote gender balance in our reference list. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work.
 Individual de-identified participant data that underlie the results reported in this article will be shared for investigators after article publication. To gain access, data requester will need to contact the corresponding author.


© 2024  American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 100 - N° 4

P. 728 - ottobre 2024 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Characteristics of factors contributing to follow-up for suspected delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection
  • Satsuki Takahashi, Kenichiro Okimoto, Tomoaki Matsumura, Yuhei Oyama, Hayato Nakazawa, Yukiyo Mamiya, Chihiro Goto, Ryosuke Horio, Akane Kurosugi, Michiko Sonoda, Tatsuya Kaneko, Naoki Akizue, Yuki Ohta, Takashi Taida, Keiko Saito, Jun Kato, Naoya Kato
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Top tips for EUS-guided celiac plexus block and neurolysis
  • Patrick Pfau

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.