Abbonarsi

Tacrolimus ointment is more effective than pimecrolimus cream with a similar safety profile in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: Results from 3 randomized, comparative studies - 21/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.12.038 
Amy S. Paller, MD a, , Mark Lebwohl, MD b, Alan B. Fleischer, MD c, Richard Antaya, MD d, Richard G. Langley, MD e, Robert S. Kirsner, MD, PhD f, Robin R. Blum, MD b, M. Joyce Rico, MD g, Eileen Jaracz, PharmD g, Andrew Crowe g, Gregory J. Linowski g

for the US/Canada Tacrolimus Ointment Study Group

  Additional members of the US/Canada Tacrolimus Ointment Study Group are listed in the Appendix, which follows the reference list.

a From Northwestern University Medical School/Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago 
b Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York 
c Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem 
d Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven 
e Dalhousie University, Halifax 
f University of Miami School of Medicine 
g Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc, Deerfield 

Reprint requests: Amy S. Paller, MD, Northwestern University, Department of Dermatology, Suite 520, 645 N Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL 60611-2923.

Chicago and Deerfield, Illinois; New York, New York; Winston-Salem, North Carolina; New Haven, Connecticut; Halifax, Nova Scotia; and Miami, Florida

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment and pimecrolimus cream in adult and pediatric patients with mild to very severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Methods

One thousand and sixty-five patients were randomized to treatment in 3 multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded, 6-week studies.

Results

Based on the Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI), tacrolimus ointment was more effective than pimecrolimus cream at the end of the study in adults (54.1% vs. 34.9%, respectively; P < .0001), in children with moderate/severe disease (67.2% vs. 56.4%, respectively; P=.04), in the combined analysis (52.8% vs. 39.1%, respectively; P < .0001), and at week 1 in children with mild disease (39.2% vs. 31.2%, respectively; P=.04). Tacrolimus was also more effective than pimecrolimus based on the Investigator Global AD Assessment (IGADA), improvement in percentage of total body surface area affected, and improvement in itch scores (P ≤ .05), with a faster onset of action. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (AEs), including application site reactions in the 2 studies involving 650 children. Adults treated with tacrolimus experienced a greater number of local application site reactions on day 1; both groups reported a similar incidence of application site reactions thereafter. More pimecrolimus-treated patients than tacrolimus-treated patients withdrew from the studies because of a lack of efficacy (P ≤ .03) or adverse events (P=.002; pediatric mild).

Conclusion

Tacrolimus ointment is more effective and has a faster onset of action than pimecrolimus cream in adults and children with AD; their safety profiles are similar.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Abbreviations used : AD, BSA, %BSA, EASI, EOS, IGADA, MedDRA, VAS


Mappa


 Supported by Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc.
Disclosure: Dr Rico, Dr Jaracz, Mr Linowski, and Mr Andrew Crowe are full-time employees of Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc. All other authors served as principal investigators in this study. Drs Paller, Fleischer, and Lebwohl are clinical investigators for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. Drs Fleischer, Langley, and Lebwohl have received research support/grants from Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. Dr Kirsner has received research support/grants from Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc. Drs Paller and Fleischer served as consultants to Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc. Drs Paller and Langley served as consultants to Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. Drs Paller and Antaya are on the Speakers Bureau of Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc. and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. Dr Fleischer is on the Speakers Bureau of Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc. Dr Lebwohl is a funded speaker for Fujisawa Healthcare, Inc.
Portions of the information included in this article were presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Pediatric Dermatology, June 2004, and at the World Congress of Pediatric Dermatology, Rome, Italy, July 2004.


© 2005  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 52 - N° 5

P. 810-822 - maggio 2005 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Intratumoral DNA stem-line heterogeneity in superficial spreading melanoma
  • Peter Helmbold, Dirk Altrichter, Thomas Klapperstück, Wolfgang Ch. Marsch
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • A retrospective biopsy study of the clinical diagnostic accuracy of common skin diseases by different specialties compared with dermatology
  • Klaus Sellheyer, Wilma F. Bergfeld

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.