Abbonarsi

Optimal defibrillation response intervals for maximum out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates - 26/08/11

Doi : 10.1067/mem.2003.266 
Valerie J. De Maio, MD, MSc, Ian G. Stiell, MD, MSc, George A. Wells, PhD, Daniel W. Spaite, MD

For the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study Group

Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (De Maio, Stiell, Wells); the Department of Emergency Medicine (Stiell) and the Department of Medicine (Stiell, Wells), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (De Maio); and the Department of Emergency Medicine, Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (Spaite) 

Address for correspondence: Valerie J. De Maio, MD, MSc, Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Ground Floor, Neurosciences Hospital, CB# 7594, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7594; 919-966-8734, fax 919-966-3049; E-mail vdemaio@med.unc.edu.

Abstract

Study objective: Many centers optimize their emergency medical services (EMS) systems to achieve a target defibrillation response interval of “call received by dispatch” to “arrival at scene by responder with defibrillator” in 8 minutes or less for at least 90% of cardiac arrest cases. The objective of this study was to analyze survival as a function of time to test the evidence for this standard. Methods: This prospective cohort study included all adult, cardiac etiology, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases from phases I and II of the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) study. Patients in the 21 Ontario study communities received a basic life support level of care with defibrillation by ambulance and firefighters but no advanced life support. Survival was plotted as a function of the defibrillation response interval. The equation of the curve, generated by means of logistic regression, was used to estimate survival at various defibrillation response interval cutoff points. Results: From January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1997, there were 392 (4.2%) survivors overall among the 9,273 patients treated. The defibrillation response interval mean was 6.2 minutes, and the 90th percentile was 9.3 minutes. There was a steep decrease in the first 5 minutes of the survival curve, beyond which the slope gradually leveled off. Controlling for known covariates, the decrement in the odds of survival with increasing response interval was 0.77 per minute (95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.83). The survival function predicts, for successive 90th percentile cutoff points, both survival rates and additional lives saved per year in the OPALS communities compared with the 8-minute standard: 9 minutes (4.6%; −18 lives), 8 minutes (5.9%; 0 lives), 7 minutes (7.5%; 23 lives), 6 minutes (9.5%; 51 lives), and 5 minutes (12.0%; 86 lives). Conclusion: The 8-minute target established in many communities is not supported by our data as the optimal EMS defibrillation response interval for cardiac arrest. EMS system leaders should consider the effect of decreasing the 90th percentile defibrillation response interval to less than 8 minutes. [Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:242-250.]

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


* Dr. Stiell holds a Distinguished Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
** Supported by peer-reviewed grants from the Emergency Health Services Branch of the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation.
 Reprints not available from the authors.
* Author contributions: VDM, IS, and GW conceived the study and designed the study. IS and GW obtained research funding. VDM, IS, and GW supervised the conduct of the study and data collection. VDM and IS managed the data. VDM, GW, and IS provided statistical advice on study design and analyzed the data. VDM drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. VDM takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.


© 2003  American College of Emergency Physicians. Pubblicato da Elsevier Masson SAS. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 42 - N° 2

P. 242-250 - agosto 2003 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Dynamic nature of electrocardiographic waveform predicts rescue shock outcome in porcine ventricular fibrillation
  • Christopher B. Lightfoot, Clifton W. Callaway, Margaret Hsieh, Kristofer C. Fertig, Lawrence D. Sherman, James J. Menegazzi
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • The eight-minute defibrillation response interval debunked: or is it?
  • David C. Cone

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.