Abbonarsi

Cost-Effectiveness of Mandatory Stress Testing in Chest Pain Center Patients - 11/09/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0196-0644(97)70314-7 
Michael G Mikhail, MD*, Frank A Smith, MD, Martha Gray, MD§, Charlene Britton, RN*, Shirley M Frederiksen, RN

Abstract

See related editorial, p 168.

Study objective: To determine whether emergency patients with acute chest pain and low suspicion of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can be managed cost-effectively and safely in a dedicated chest pain center (CPC) that incorporates mandatory stress testing. Methods: We assembled a prospective observational case series of consecutive adult patients transferred from the emergency department to a nine-bed, 23-hour CPC in a 564-bed community hospital from January 13 through May 31, 1994. In our institution, all emergency patients with acute nontraumatic chest pain of unclear origin, suggestive of myocardial ischemia but with a low probability of AMI, are transferred to the CPC for further evaluation. All patients in whom AMI is ruled out undergo individually appropriate cardiac diagnostic testing in accordance with CPC clinical guidelines. Patients with end-stage coronary artery disease transferred to the CPC for a “rule-out” protocol only did not undergo further diagnostic testing. Admitted and discharged patients were followed through chart review and telephone survey, respectively. Results: Of the 502 patients transferred to the CPC, 477 (95%) completed follow-up at 14 days. Four hundred ten (86%) were discharged home. Those discharged after diagnostic evaluation yielded negative findings had 100% survival and zero diagnosis of AMI at 5-month follow-up. Overall mortality and incidence of AMI on long-term follow-up for all patients transferred to the CPC were .4% and .2%, respectively. Sixty-seven patients (13%) were admitted from the CPC, of whom 44 (66%) had a final diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (IHD) or AMI. Twenty-four patients with IHD (55%; 6% of stress-tested group) were identified only on further stress testing. Of these patients, seven underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting during hospitalization. All were discharged home without major morbidity. Four hundred twenty-four patients (84%) underwent stress testing. The cost of mandatory stress testing to identify one patient with IHD after AMI was ruled out was $3,125. An average cost-per-case savings of 62% was achieved for each patient transferred to the CPC who would have been hospitalized before the inception of the CPC. Conclusion: Mandatory stress testing is a safe, cost-effective, and valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool in CPC patients. [Mikhail MG, Smith FA, Gray M, Britton C, Frederiksen SM: Cost-effectiveness of mandatory stress testing in chest pain center patients. Ann Emerg Med January 1997;29:88-98.]

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Mappa


 From the Departments of Emergency Medicine*, Cardiology, and Primary Care§ and the Clinical Research Office, St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
 Address for reprints: Michael Mikhail, MD, Emergency Medicine Residency Program, University of Michigan/St Joseph Mercy Hospital, IB 95, 5305 East Huron River Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106
 Reprint no. 47/1/78152


© 1997  Mosby, Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 29 - N° 1

P. 88-98 - gennaio 1997 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Conclusions and Recommendations
  • Harry P Selker, Robert J Zalenski, Elliott M Antman, Tom P Aufderheide, Sheilah Ann Bernard, Robert O Bonow, W.Brian Gibler, Michael D Hagen, Paula Johnson, Joseph Lau, Robert A McNutt, Joseph Ornato, J.Sanford Schwartz, Jane D Scott, Paul A Tunick, W.Douglas Weaver, National Heart Attack Alert Program Coordinating Committee Working Group on “Evaluation of Technologies for Identifying Acute Cardiac Ischemia in the Emergency Department”
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Feasability of a Rapid Diagnostic Protocol for an Emergency Department Chest Pain Unit
  • Robert J Zalenski, Robert J Rydman, Madeline McCarren, Rebecca R Roberts, Borko Jovanovic, Krishna Das, Edward K Mensah, Linda M Kampe

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.