Abbonarsi

Gestational angiogenic biomarker patterns in high risk preeclampsia groups - 25/12/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.017 
Sharon E. Maynard, MD a, c, Sybil L. Crawford, PhD d, Susanne Bathgate, MD b, Jing Yan, BA e, Laura Robidoux, BA g, i, Melissa Moore, PhD e, Tiffany A. Moore Simas, MD, MPH, MEd f, g, h, i
a Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 
b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC 
c Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA 
d Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 
e Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 
f Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 
g Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Worcester, MA 
h Department of Pediatrics, Worcester, MA 
i University of Massachusetts Memorial Health Care, Worcester, MA 

Abstract

Objective

Several conditions are associated with increased preeclampsia (PE) risk. Whether altered maternal angiogenic factor levels contribute to risk in these conditions is unknown. Our objective was to compare angiogenic biomarker patterns in high-risk pregnancies and low-risk controls.

Study Design

We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a 2-center observational study of angiogenic biomarkers in high-risk women. A total of 156 pregnant women with a PE risk factor and 59 low-risk controls were studied. Serial maternal serum samples were collected during 3 gestational windows: 23-27 weeks, 28-31 weeks, and 32-35 weeks. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1), soluble endoglin (sEng), and placental growth factor (PlGF) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Geometric mean angiogenic biomarker levels and angiogenic ratio (sFlt1 + sEng):PlGF were compared with low-risk controls for each risk group, at each gestational window.

Results

Gestational biomarker patterns differed in PE risk groups as compared with low-risk controls. Women with multiple gestations had markedly higher sFlt1 and sEng at all gestational windows. Women with prior PE had higher sFlt1 and angiogenic ratio, and lower PlGF, from 28 weeks onward. Women with chronic hypertension had significantly higher angiogenic ratio for all 3 gestational windows, but differences disappeared when women with PE were excluded. Obese and nulliparous women had significantly lower PlGF, but no differences in the angiogenic ratio.

Conclusion

High-risk groups have altered angiogenic biomarker patterns compared with controls, suggesting that altered production or metabolism of these factors may contribute to PE risk, particularly in women with multiple gestations and prior PE.

Il testo completo di questo articolo è disponibile in PDF.

Keywords : angiogenic factors, preeclampsia, PlGF, sEng, sFlt1


Mappa


 Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers UL1RR031982 and UL1TR000161 and by the Wilson Genetics Endowment of the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences.
 S.E.M. is named as a coinventor on a patent filed by Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for the use of angiogenesis-related proteins for diagnosis and treatment of preeclampsia. All remaining authors report no conflict of interest.
 The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
 Reprints will not be available.
 Cite this article as: Maynard SE, Crawford SL, Bathgate S, et al. Gestational angiogenic biomarker patterns in high risk preeclampsia groups. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:53.e1-9.


© 2013  Mosby, Inc. Tutti i diritti riservati.
Aggiungere alla mia biblioteca Togliere dalla mia biblioteca Stampare
Esportazione

    Citazioni Export

  • File

  • Contenuto

Vol 209 - N° 1

P. 53.e1-53.e9 - luglio 2013 Ritorno al numero
Articolo precedente Articolo precedente
  • Risk factors for uterine atony/postpartum hemorrhage requiring treatment after vaginal delivery
  • Luisa A. Wetta, Jeff M. Szychowski, Samantha Seals, Melissa S. Mancuso, Joseph R. Biggio, Alan T.N. Tita
| Articolo seguente Articolo seguente
  • Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis versus in vitro fertilization: cost-based decision analysis
  • Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron, Jordan Winter

Benvenuto su EM|consulte, il riferimento dei professionisti della salute.
L'accesso al testo integrale di questo articolo richiede un abbonamento.

Già abbonato a @@106933@@ rivista ?

@@150455@@ Voir plus

Il mio account


Dichiarazione CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM è registrato presso la CNIL, dichiarazione n. 1286925.

Ai sensi della legge n. 78-17 del 6 gennaio 1978 sull'informatica, sui file e sulle libertà, Lei puo' esercitare i diritti di opposizione (art.26 della legge), di accesso (art.34 a 38 Legge), e di rettifica (art.36 della legge) per i dati che La riguardano. Lei puo' cosi chiedere che siano rettificati, compeltati, chiariti, aggiornati o cancellati i suoi dati personali inesati, incompleti, equivoci, obsoleti o la cui raccolta o di uso o di conservazione sono vietati.
Le informazioni relative ai visitatori del nostro sito, compresa la loro identità, sono confidenziali.
Il responsabile del sito si impegna sull'onore a rispettare le condizioni legali di confidenzialità applicabili in Francia e a non divulgare tali informazioni a terzi.


Tutto il contenuto di questo sito: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, i suoi licenziatari e contributori. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Inclusi diritti per estrazione di testo e di dati, addestramento dell’intelligenza artificiale, e tecnologie simili. Per tutto il contenuto ‘open access’ sono applicati i termini della licenza Creative Commons.