S'abonner

Capsaicin 8% Patch in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study - 18/04/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.09.008 
David M. Simpson , Jessica Robinson-Papp , Joanna Van , Malcolm Stoker , Hélène Jacobs , Robert J. Snijder , Diederik S. Schregardus , §, Stephen K. Long , , Bruno Lambourg , Nathaniel Katz ∗∗, ††
 Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 
 Diabetes Research Center, Tustin, California 
 Global Medical Science, Astellas Pharma Europe BV, Leiden, The Netherlands 
§ Chiltern International, Leiden, The Netherlands 
 INC Research, Camberley, United Kingdom 
 Helix Biomedics LLC, Boynton Beach, Florida 
∗∗ Analgesic Solutions, Natick, Massachusetts 
†† Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 

Address reprint requests to David M. Simpson, MD, Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Box 1052, New York, NY 10029.Department of NeurologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiBox 1052New YorkNY10029

Abstract

This 12-week study evaluated the efficacy and safety of capsaicin 8% patch versus placebo patch in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN). Patients aged 18 years or older with PDPN were randomized (1:1) to one 30-minute treatment (capsaicin 8% patch or placebo patch) to painful areas of the feet. Overall, 369 patients were randomized (capsaicin 8% patch, n = 186; placebo patch, n = 183). Percentage reduction in average daily pain score from baseline to between weeks 2 through 8 (the primary end point) was statistically significant for capsaicin 8% patch versus placebo (−27.4% vs −20.9%; P = .025); improvements in pain were observed from week 2 onward. Versus placebo, patients treated with capsaicin 8% patch had a shorter median time to treatment response (19 vs 72 days) and modest improvements in sleep interference scores from baseline to between weeks 2 through 8 (P = .030) and weeks 2 through 12 (P = .020). Apart from application site reactions, treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups. No indications of deterioration in sensory perception of sharp, cold, warm, or vibration stimuli were observed. In patients with PDPN, capsaicin 8% patch treatment provided modest pain relief and sleep quality improvements versus a placebo patch, similar in magnitude to other treatments with known efficacy, but without systemic side effects or sensory deterioration.

Perspective

To our knowledge, this is the first study of the capsaicin 8% patch versus placebo in patients with PDPN to show that one 30-minute capsaicin treatment provides modest improvements in pain and sleep quality. Results confirm the clinical utility of the capsaicin 8% patch in the diabetic population.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Graphical abstract




Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Capsaicin 8% patch provided effective relief in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Improvements in sleep quality were modest and significant with capsaicin 8% patch.
Capsaicin 8% patch was well tolerated with no deterioration in sensory perception.
Safety and tolerability were in line with previous studies of capsaicin 8% patch.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Capsaicin 8% patch, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, NPRS average daily pain score, Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy, phase 3 study


Plan


 This study was funded by Astellas Pharma Europe B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands. Astellas developed the protocol in conjunction with the clinical investigators and provided the study drug. The authors received editorial support for manuscript preparation from Sarah Reynolds of NexGen Healthcare Communications, London, United Kingdom, and this assistance was supported by Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd. The authors, however, directed and are fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions for this report.
 D.M.S. has consulted for and received research grants from Astellas Pharma, Acorda, and Viromed and received speaking honoraria from Acorda. N.K. was a paid consultant for Astellas Pharma to support the design of this study and received a research grant from Astellas Pharma. M.S., H.J., and R.J.S. are employed by Astellas Pharma Europe BV. D.S.S. is employed by Chiltern International (CRO) but was exclusively outsourced to Astellas for the duration of the study. S.K.L. was employed by Astellas Pharma Europe BV at the time of the study. J.V., J.R.-P., and B.L. have no conflicts of interest to declare.
 Supplementary data accompanying this article are available online at www.jpain.org and www.sciencedirect.com/.
 ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01533428.


© 2016  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 18 - N° 1

P. 42-53 - janvier 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Headache Impairs Attentional Performance: A Conceptual Replication and Extension
  • Nina Attridge, Christopher Eccleston, Donna Noonan, Elaine Wainwright, Edmund Keogh
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Identifying Treatment Effect Modifiers in the STarT Back Trial: A Secondary Analysis
  • Jason M. Beneciuk, Jonathan C. Hill, Paul Campbell, Ebenezer Afolabi, Steven Z. George, Kate M. Dunn, Nadine E. Foster

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.