Optimizing physician skill development for medical students: The four-part assessment - 27/09/17
, Phillip M. Kemp Bohan, BA a
, Katrina Ramsey, MPH b
, John D. Yonge, MD a
, Christopher R. Connelly, MD a
, Richard J. Mullins, MD a
, Jennifer M. Watters, MD a
, Martin A. Schreiber, MD a
, Laszlo N. Kiraly, MD a 
Abstract |
Background |
Medical student performance has been poorly correlated with residency performance and warrants further investigation. We propose a novel surgical assessment tool to determine correlations with clinical aptitude.
Methods |
Retrospective review of medical student assessments from 2013 to 2015. Faculty rating of student performance was evaluated by: 1) case presentation, 2) problem definition, 3) question response and 4) use of literature and correlated to final exam assessment. A Likert scale interrater reliability was evaluated.
Results |
Sixty student presentations were scored (4.8 assessors/presentation). A student's case presentation, problem definition, and question response was correlated with performance (r = 0.49 to 0.61, p ≤ 0.003). Moderate correlations for either question response or use of literature was demonstrated (0.3 and 0.26, p < 0.05).
Conclusion |
Our four-part assessment tool identified correlations with course and examination grades for medical students. As surgical education evolves, validated performance and reliable testing measures are required.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 213 - N° 5
P. 906-909 - mai 2017 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
