Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Is Routine Urinary Catheterization Still Mandatory in the Era of Enhanced Recovery? - 16/02/19
, Inès Dominique a, Jean-Etienne Terrier a, René Ecochard b, c, d, e, Hélène Hacquard a, Alain Ruffion a, Philippe Paparel a, 1Abstract |
Objective |
To assess the benefits and safety of noncatheterization during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy within an enhanced recovery protocol.
Materials and Methods |
A single-center retrospective comparative study was carried out of consecutive patients who underwent a robot-assisted partial nephrectomy between February 2015 and December 2017 within an early recovery program. The patients who received a urinary catheter were compared with those who did not in terms of postoperative complications, acute urinary retention rates, urinary tract infection rates, and lengths of hospital stay.
Results |
Of the 145 patients who followed an early recovery program after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the study period, 96 received a urinary catheter and 49 did not. There was no significant difference between these 2 groups in terms of the rates of acute urinary retention (3% vs 6%, respectively; P = .393), urinary tract infection (3% vs 2%; P = .707), postoperative complications (14% vs 18%; P = .445), or readmissions within 30 days (8% vs 6%; P = .636). However, patients who did not receive a catheter had shorter initial and total (including readmissions) lengths of hospital stay (respectively 2.16 days vs 2.56 days; P = .058, and 2.27 days vs 3.40 days; P <.001).
Conclusion |
Our findings challenge the routine use of urinary catheterization during robot-assisted partial nephrectomies. Noncatheterization does not seem to increase the risk of postoperative urinary retention. Only catheterizing specific at-risk patients may prove beneficial.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
| Financial disclosure: The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests. |
|
| Funding Support: The translation of this article was supported by the Bibliothèque Scientifique de l'Internat de Lyon and the Hospices Civils de Lyon. |
Vol 124
P. 148-153 - février 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- The Association of the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) Score With Total Operative Time in Patients Undergoing Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy
- Katherine J Cockerill, Stacy Young, Colleen T. Ball, Kaitlynn Custer, C. Burcin Taner, Dana K Perry, David D. Thiel
- Effect of the Need for Preoperative Dialysis on Perioperative Outcomes on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
- Danica May, Dunia Khaled, Marc R. Matrana, Stephen F. Bardot, Kathleen Lata-Arias, Daniel Canter
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?