Institutional trust and misinformation in the response to the 2018–19 Ebola outbreak in North Kivu, DR Congo: a population-based survey - 01/05/19
, Phuong N Pham, PhD a, Kenedy K Bindu b, Juliet Bedford, DPhil c, Eric J Nilles, MD aSummary |
Background |
The current outbreak of Ebola in eastern DR Congo, beginning in 2018, emerged in a complex and violent political and security environment. Community-level prevention and outbreak control measures appear to be dependent on public trust in relevant authorities and information, but little scholarship has explored these issues. We aimed to investigate the role of trust and misinformation on individual preventive behaviours during an outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD).
Methods |
We surveyed 961 adults between Sept 1 and Sept 16, 2018. We used a multistage sampling design in Beni and Butembo in North Kivu, DR Congo. Of 412 avenues and cells (the lowest administrative structures; 99 in Beni and 313 in Butembo), we randomly selected 30 in each city. In each avenue or cell, 16 households were selected using the WHO Expanded Programme on Immunization’s random walk approach. In each household, one adult (aged ≥18 years) was randomly selected for interview. Standardised questionnaires were administered by experienced interviewers. We used multivariate models to examine the intermediate variables of interest, including institutional trust and belief in selected misinformation, with outcomes of interest related to EVD prevention behaviours.
Findings |
Among 961 respondents, 349 (31·9%, 95% CI 27·4–36·9) trusted that local authorities represent their interest. Belief in misinformation was widespread, with 230 (25·5%, 21·7–29·6) respondents believing that the Ebola outbreak was not real. Low institutional trust and belief in misinformation were associated with a decreased likelihood of adopting preventive behaviours, including acceptance of Ebola vaccines (odds ratio 0·22, 95% CI 0·21–0·22, and 1·40, 1·39–1·42) and seeking formal health care (0·06, 0·05–0·06, and 1·16, 1·15–1·17).
Interpretation |
The findings underscore the practical implications of mistrust and misinformation for outbreak control. These factors are associated with low compliance with messages of social and behavioural change and refusal to seek formal medical care or accept vaccines, which in turn increases the risk of spread of EVD.
Funding |
The Harvard Humanitarian Initiative Innovation Fund.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 19 - N° 5
P. 529-536 - mai 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Active and passive case-finding in tuberculosis-affected households in Peru: a 10-year prospective cohort study
- Matthew J Saunders, Marco A Tovar, Dami Collier, Matthew R Baldwin, Rosario Montoya, Teresa R Valencia, Robert H Gilman, Carlton A Evans
- Epidemiological characteristics of an urban plague epidemic in Madagascar, August–November, 2017: an outbreak report
- Rindra Randremanana, Voahangy Andrianaivoarimanana, Birgit Nikolay, Beza Ramasindrazana, Juliette Paireau, Quirine Astrid ten Bosch, Jean Marius Rakotondramanga, Soloandry Rahajandraibe, Soanandrasana Rahelinirina, Fanjasoa Rakotomanana, Feno M Rakotoarimanana, Léa Bricette Randriamampionona, Vaoary Razafimbia, Mamy Jean De Dieu Randria, Mihaja Raberahona, Guillain Mikaty, Anne-Sophie Le Guern, Lamina Arthur Rakotonjanabelo, Charlotte Faty Ndiaye, Voahangy Rasolofo, Eric Bertherat, Maherisoa Ratsitorahina, Simon Cauchemez, Laurence Baril, André Spiegel, Minoarisoa Rajerison
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?