How learning preferences and teaching styles influence effectiveness of surgical educators - 13/03/21
, Barbara L Bass b, Edward A Graviss a, c, Duc T Nguyen c, Kevin Y Pei dAbstract |
Background |
Effective surgical educators have specific attributes and learner-relationships. Our aim was to determine how intrinsic learning preferences and teaching styles affect surgical educator effectiveness.
Methods |
We determined i) learning preferences ii) teaching styles and iii) self-assessment of teaching skills for all general surgery attendings. All general surgical residents in our program completed teaching evaluations of attendings.
Results |
Multimodal was the most common learning preference (20/28). Although the multimodal learning preference appears to be associated with more effective educators than kinesthetic learning preferences, the difference was not statistically significant (80.0% versus 66.7%, p = 0.43). Attendings with Teaching Style 5 were more likely to have a lower “professional attitude towards residents” score on SETQ assessment by residents (OR 0.33 (0.11, 0.96), p = 0.04). Attendings rated their own “communication of goals” (p < 0.001), “evaluation of residents” (p = 0.04) and “overall teaching performance” (p = 0.01) per STEQ domains as significantly lower than the resident’s assessment of these cofactors.
Conclusion |
Identification of factors intrinsic to surgical educators with high effectiveness is important for faculty development. Completion of a teaching style self-assessment by attendings could improve effectiveness.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Surgical educators most commonly have multimodal learning preferences. |
• | Certain teaching styles are associated with effectiveness in surgical educators. |
• | Surgical educators rate their teaching effectiveness lower than residents rate them. |
Keywords : Educator, Learning, Teaching, Preference
Plan
| ☆ | Accepted for presentation at Surgical Education Week, Seattle, April 28- May 2 2020, meeting cancelled due to COVID-19 |
Vol 221 - N° 2
P. 256-260 - février 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
