Editorial: Time to Recognize Nonverbal Learning Disability to Foster Advances in Its Research - 20/01/22
Résumé |
The definitions of most of the currently recognized neurodevelopmental disorders and the criteria used to identify them have seen important changes since their inclusion in diagnostic classification systems (see, for instance, how the definitions of specific learning disorders and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been revised in successive versions of DSM). As is the case with many other mental conditions, our understanding of neurodevelopmental disorders is continuously being updated in the light of new research findings. However, this has not been the case for nonverbal learning disability. More than 50 years since it was first described,1 there is still no consensus on the merits of identifying it as a separate disorder or using a clear and acknowledged diagnostic label. Instead of trying to establish why nonverbal learning disability has yet to be included in the diagnostic manuals, this editorial examines why recognized criteria for the condition would improve research in this field and avoid the negative consequences of continuing to conduct research without adopting shared criteria.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.| The author has reported no funding for this work. |
|
| Disclosure: Dr. Mammarella has reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. |
|
| All statements expressed in this column are those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions of the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. See the Guide for Authors for information about the preparation and submission of Editorials. |
Vol 61 - N° 2
P. 120-121 - février 2022 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

