Double-layered purse string uterine suture compared with single-layer continuous uterine suture: A randomized Controlled trial - 29/01/22
, Olivier AMI, MD c, Rania MERAI, MD a, b, Luka VELEMIR, MD d, Benedicte SIMON, MD e, Denis FAUCK, MD f, Amel TRIKI, MD a, bBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
| pages | 7 |
| Iconographies | 5 |
| Vidéos | 0 |
| Autres | 0 |
Abstract |
Background |
With the aim of preventing cesarean scar defects, we introduced a new technique involving a purse string uterine suture. To date, this uterine suture technique has not been formally evaluated. The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that compared to single layer continuous uterine suture (SLCUS), a double layered purse string uterine suture (PSUS) significantly reduces cesarean scar defect (CSD) rates, without increasing the perioperative maternal morbidity.
Methods |
A prospective randomized study. Primary outcome was the rate of CSD. 100 patients were enrolled in 2 groups according to the uterine suture technique. A hysterosonography was performed by the same senior obstetrician blinded to the uterine suture technique 6 months after surgery .Operative time and calculated blood loss (CBL) were used for the short time analysis. Uterine and CSD measurements were used for the mid time analysis.
Results |
Despite a longer operative time with PSUS (7.17 ± 2.31 min Vs. 6.31 ± 3.04 min, p = 0.028; p <10‾³); there was no significant difference in terms of CBL (520 ± 58 with PSUS vs. 536 ± 50 ml, p = 0.724). There was a significant decrease in the rate of CSD with PSUS: 6.66% Vs.40% with SLUCS; p<0.001. Moreover, SLUCS was the leading risk factor for CSD: adjusted OR=6; 95% CI [0–1], p<10‾³).
Conclusion |
Compared to single layer continuous suture, double layered purse stringuterine suture significantly reduces cesarean scar defect rates, without increasing the perioperative maternal morbidity.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Cesarean section, Uterine suture, Blood loss, Scar defect
Abbreviations : AMT, BVM, %BVΔ, CSD, CBL, CS, FAUCS, RMT, SLCUS, PSUS, SIS
Plan
Vol 51 - N° 2
Article 102282- février 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- The role of shear wave elastography in the assessment of placentas in healthy pregnancy women during third-trimester: A preliminary study
- Qiao Chen, Ya-Mei Zhu, Yu-Ke Zhang, Li-Ping Gui, Hong-Rong Fan, Ying Zhang, Man Chen
- Prospective evaluation of the connected biofeedback EMY Kegel trainer in the management of stress urinary incontinence
- Floriane JOCHUM, Olivier GARBIN, Julien GODET, Mathilde RAGUENEAU, Chantal MEYER, Sylvie BILLECOCQ, Lise LECOINTRE, Chérif AKLADIOS, Aline HOST
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’achat d’article à l’unité est indisponible à l’heure actuelle.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?