S'abonner

Efficacy against pneumococcal carriage and the immunogenicity of reduced-dose (0 + 1 and 1 + 1) PCV10 and PCV13 schedules in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam: a parallel, single-blind, randomised controlled trial - 27/07/23

Doi : 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00061-0 
Beth Temple, MSc a, c, d, * , Hau Phuc Tran, MD e, *, Vo Thi Trang Dai, MSc f, *, Heidi Smith-Vaughan, ProfPhD b, *,

The VPT-II Collaborator Group

  Members listed at end of paper
Anne Balloch, Jemima Beissbarth, Kathryn Bright, Rachel Ann Higgins, Jason Hinds, Pham Thi Hoan, Monica Larissa Nation, Cattram Duong Nguyen, Belinda Daniela Ortika, Thanh V Phan, Tran Linh Phuong, Leena Spry, Ho Nguyen Loc Thuy, Nguyen Trong Toan, Doan Y Uyen, Le Thi Tuong Vy

Paul Vincent Licciardi, PhD c, g, , Catherine Satzke, PhD c, g, h, , Thuong Vu Nguyen, MD e, , Kim Mulholland, ProfMD c, d, g,
a Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia 
b Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia 
c Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 
d Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK 
e Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Pasteur Institute of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam 
f Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Pasteur Institute of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam 
g Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 
h Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 

*Correspondence to: Beth Temple, Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0811, AustraliaGlobal and Tropical Health DivisionMenzies School of Health ResearchCharles Darwin UniversityDarwinNT0811Australia

Summary

Background

Interest in reduced-dose pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) schedules is growing, but data on their ability to provide direct and indirect protection are scarce. We evaluated 1 + 1 (at 2 months and 12 months) and 0 + 1 (at 12 months) schedules of PCV10 or PCV13 in a predominately unvaccinated population.

Methods

In this parallel, single-blind, randomised controlled trial, healthy infants aged 2 months were recruited from birth records in three districts in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, and assigned (4:4:4:4:9) to one of five groups: PCV10 at 12 months of age (0 + 1 PCV10), PCV13 at 12 months of age (0 + 1 PCV13), PCV10 at 2 months and 12 months of age (1 + 1 PCV10), PCV13 at 2 months and 12 months of age (1 + 1 PCV13), and unvaccinated control. Outcome assessors were masked to group allocation, and the infants’ caregivers and those administering vaccines were not. Nasopharyngeal swabs collected at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months were analysed for pneumococcal carriage. Blood samples collected from a subset of participants (200 per group) at various timepoints were analysed by ELISA and opsonophagocytic assay. The primary outcome was the efficacy of each schedule against vaccine-type carriage at 24 months, analysed by intention to treat for all those with a nasopharyngeal swab available. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03098628.

Findings

2501 infants were enrolled between March 8, 2017, and July 24, 2018 and randomly assigned to study groups (400 to 0 + 1 PCV10, 400 to 0 + 1 PCV13, 402 to 1 + 1 PCV10, 401 to 1 + 1 PCV13, and 898 to control). Analysis of the primary endpoint included 341 participants for 0 + 1 PCV10, 356 0 + 1 PCV13, 358 1 + 1 PCV10, 350 1 + 1 PCV13, and 758 control. At 24 months, a 1 + 1 PCV10 schedule reduced PCV10-type carriage by 58% (95% CI 25 to 77), a 1 + 1 PCV13 schedule reduced PCV13-type carriage by 65% (42 to 79), a 0 + 1 PCV10 schedule reduced PCV10-type carriage by 53% (17 to 73), and a 0 + 1 PCV13 schedule non-significantly reduced PCV13-type carriage by 25% (–7 to 48) compared with the unvaccinated control group. Reactogenicity and serious adverse events were similar across groups.

Interpretation

A 1 + 1 PCV schedule greatly reduces vaccine-type carriage and is likely to generate substantial herd protection and provide some degree of individual protection during the first year of life. Such a schedule is suitable for mature PCV programmes or for introduction in conjunction with a comprehensive catch-up campaign, and potentially could be most effective given as a mixed regimen (PCV10 then PCV13). A 0 + 1 PCV schedule has some effect on carriage along with a reasonable immune response and could be considered for use in humanitarian crises or remote settings.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Translation

For the Vietnamese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2023  The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 23 - N° 8

P. 933-944 - août 2023 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Performance of antigen lateral flow devices in the UK during the alpha, delta, and omicron waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a diagnostic and observational study
  • David W Eyre, Matthias Futschik, Sarah Tunkel, Jia Wei, Joanna Cole-Hamilton, Rida Saquib, Nick Germanacos, Andrew R Dodgson, Paul E Klapper, Malur Sudhanva, Chris Kenny, Peter Marks, Edward Blandford, Susan Hopkins, Tim E A Peto, Tom Fowler
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Clinical impact of syndromic molecular point-of-care testing for gastrointestinal pathogens in adults hospitalised with suspected gastroenteritis (GastroPOC): a pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial
  • Nathan J Brendish, Kate R Beard, Ahalya K Malachira, Alex R Tanner, Langizya Sanga-Nyirongo, Markus Gwiggner, J R Fraser Cummings, Helen E Moyses, Tristan W Clark

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2025 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.