Cost-avoidance associated with implementation of an overnight emergency medicine pharmacist at a Level I Trauma, Comprehensive Stroke Center - 15/07/24
, Kyle Gordon, PharmD, Breyanna Reachi, PharmD, Jeremy Bair, PharmD, Stephanie Chauv, PharmD, Gabriel V. Fontaine, PharmD, MBAAbstract |
Aim |
To investigate the cost-avoidance associated with implementation of an overnight emergency medicine pharmacist (EMP) through documented clinical interventions.
Design |
Retrospective evaluation of prospectively tracked interventions in a single Level I Trauma, Comprehensive Stroke Center, from November 25, 2020 through March 12, 2021 during expanded emergency medicine service hours (2300–0700).
Interventions |
One of 45 clinical patient-care recommendations associated with cost-avoidance were available to be selected and documented by the EMP; more than one intervention was allowed per patient, though one clinical intervention could not be counted as multiple items. Documented services were associated with monetary cost avoidance based upon available literature assessing pharmacy clinical interventions. Differences in time from imaging to systemic thrombolytics and percentage of patients meeting door-to-alteplase benchmarks were compared with and without the availability of EMPs.
Results |
Overnight EMPs documented 820 interventions during 107 overnight shifts with a cost avoidance of $612,974. The most common interventions were bedside monitoring (n = 127; $50,694), drug information consultation (97; $11,269), and antimicrobial therapy initiation and streamlining (95; $60,101). When categorizing interventions, 378 (46%; $292,484) were input as hands-on care, 216 (26%; $94,899) as individualization of patient care, 135 (17%; $25,897) as administrative and supportive tasks, 84 (10%; $121,746) as adverse drug event prevention, and 7 (1%; $77,964) as resource utilization. All patients (n = 6) with an acute ischemic stroke during the evaluation period received systemic thrombolytics ≤45 min in the presence of EMPs compared with 50% receiving thrombolytics ≤45 min without EMPs.
Conclusions |
Expanded overnight coverage by EMPs provided clinical bedside pharmacotherapy expertise to critically ill patients otherwise not available prior to study implementation. Clinical interventions were associated with substantial cost-avoidance.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Highlights |
• | Emergency medicine pharmacists are essential for optimization of patient-centered care. |
• | Overnight coverage by emergency medicine pharmacists provided clinical pharmacotherapy services typically not available for critically ill patients. |
• | Clinical interventions recommended by emergency medicine pharmacists are associated with substantial cost-avoidance. |
• | Future studies are needed to investigate the impact of emergency medicine pharmacists on patient-centered outcomes. |
Keywords : Cost, Medication, Pharmacist, Medical care, Value, Safety
Abbreviations : ACLS, ADE, AIS, ASHP, CA, CPA, ED, EMP, NCCTH, RSI, COVID-19, SD, USD
Plan
Vol 82
P. 63-67 - août 2024 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
