His bundle pacing versus left bundle branch area pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation: A prospective and comparative study - 25/09/24
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.
Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!
Graphical abstract |
Highlights |
• | Left bundle branch area pacing provided better 1-year outcome than HBP. |
• | Significant improvement in LVEF and NHYA class observed with both techniques. |
• | These data may clarify the role of HBP vs LBBAP in the “ablate and pace” strategy. |
Abstract |
Background |
Pacemaker implantation combined with atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) is a well-established strategy for uncontrolled atrial arrhythmias. Limited data are available regarding His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in this setting.
Aim |
To compare the outcomes of HBP and LBBAP in patients undergoing pacemaker implantation combined with AVN in routine clinical practice.
Methods |
We prospectively included all patients who underwent AVNA after successful conduction system pacing (CSP) in two hospitals between September 2017 and May 2023. The primary outcome was the 1-year composite of first episode of heart failure hospitalization, symptomatic atrioventricular node reconduction requiring a second AVNA procedure, lead revision or death from any cause.
Results |
A total of 164 patients underwent AVNA following successful CSP (68 HBP and 96 LBBAP). Mean pacemaker implantation and AVNA procedure times were shorter in the LBBAP group than the HBP group (46±18 vs 59±23min; P<0.001 and 31±12 vs 43±22min, respectively; P<0.001). Complete atrioventricular block was more frequently obtained in the LBBAP group (88/96 patients [92%] vs 54/68 patients [79%]; P=0.04). One-year freedom from the composite outcome was more frequent in the LBBAP group (89.7% vs 72.9%; hazard ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.14−0.72; P=0.01). The strategy was similarly effective in both groups with a significant improvement in NYHA class and left ventricular ejection fraction. A secondary pacing threshold elevation >1V occurred only in the HBP group (11%).
Conclusion |
In this prospective, comparative study, LBBAP provided better 1-year outcomes than HBP.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Atrial fibrillation, Atrioventricular node ablation, Conduction system pacing, His-bundle pacing, Left bundle branch area pacing
Plan
| ☆ | X (Twitter) handle: @Cardio_CHURouen. |
| ☆☆ | X post (Tweet): LBBAP provides better outcomes than HBP in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation for non-controlled atrial arrhythmia. |
Vol 117 - N° 8-9
P. 505-513 - août 2024 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Deaths and major cardiovascular events in patients with lymphoma: Analysis from a French nationwide hospitalization database
- Romain Didier, Amandine Durand, Mathieu Boulin, Denis Caillot, Alexandre Bodin, Julien Herbert, Bernard Bonnotte, Marianne Zeller, Yves Cottin, Laurent Fauchier
- Rationale and design of the French Observatory of Acute Heart Failure (OFICA2)
- Claire Bouleti, Benjamin Alos, Damien Legallois, Romain Eschalier, Jerome Costa, Victoria Tea, Jean-Noel Trochu, Guillaume Turlotte, Julie Perrin-Faurie, Teodora Dutoiu, François Picard, Gregory Ducrocq, Pascal de Groote, Thierry Laperche, Clement Delmas, Ariel Cohen, Maxime Doublet, Damien Logeart
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.