Digoxin Discontinuation in Patients With HFrEF on Beta-Blockers: Implication for Future 'Knock-Out Trials' in Heart Failure - 11/02/25

Abstract |
Background |
National heart failure guidelines recommend quadruple therapy with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), most of whom also receive loop diuretics. However, the guidelines are less clear about the safe approaches to discontinuing older drugs whose decreasing or residual benefit is less well understood. The objective of this study was to examine whether digoxin can be safely discontinued in patients with HFrEF receiving beta-blockers.
Methods |
In OPTIMIZE-HF, of 2477 patients with HFrEF (EF ≤45%) receiving beta-blockers and digoxin, digoxin was discontinued in 450 patients. We assembled a propensity score-matched cohort of 433 pairs of patients in which digoxin continuation vs. discontinuation groups were balanced on 51 baseline characteristics. Using the same approach, from 992 patients not on beta-blockers, we assembled a matched cohort of 198 pairs of patients also balanced on 51 baseline characteristics. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for 1-year outcomes were estimated.
Results |
Among patients receiving beta-blockers, digoxin discontinuation had no association with the combined endpoint of heart failure readmission or death (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.85-1.19), heart failure readmission (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.85-1.25) or death (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.72-1.14). Respective HRs (95% CIs) among patients not receiving beta-blockers were 1.60 (1.25-2.04), 1.62 (1.18-2.22) and 1.43 (1.08-1.89).
Conclusions |
Digoxin can be discontinued without increasing the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with HFrEF receiving beta-blockers. Future studies need to examine the residual benefit of older heart failure drugs to ensure their safe discontinuation in patients with HFrEF receiving newer guideline-directed medical therapy.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Beta-blockers, Digoxin, Discontinuation, Heart failure, HFrEF
Plan
| Funding: Dr. Ali Ahmed was in part supported by the National Institutes of Health through grants (R01-HL085561 and R01-HL097047) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). OPTIMIZE-HF was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline, but played no role in the design, conduct, analyses or interpretation of the current study. |
|
| Conflict of Interest: Dr. Fonarow reports consulting with Abbott, Amgen, Bayer, Janssen, Medtronic, Novartis, and was the Principal Investigator of OPTIMIZE-HF. Dr. Butler reports consulting for Abbott, American Regent, Amgen, Applied Therapeutic, AskBio, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimension, Cardior, CSL Bearing, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Edwards, Element Science, Faraday, Foundry, Innolife, Impulse Dynamics, Imbria, Inventiva, Ionis, Lexicon, Lilly, LivaNova, Janssen, Medtronics, Merck, Occlutech, Owkin, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Pharmain, Pfize, Prolaio, Regeneron, Renibus, Roche, Salamandra, Sanofi, SC Pharma, Secretome, Sequana, SQ Innovation, Tenex, Tricog, Ultromics, Vifor, and Zoll. None of the other authors report any conflicts of interest related to this manuscript. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Department of Veterans Affairs. |
|
| Authorship: PHL: Writing—review and editing, Writing—original draft, Supervision, Conceptualization; KL: Writing—review and editing, Writing—original draft, AAA: Writing—review and editing, Writing—original draft, JB: Writing—review and editing, Conceptualization, PAH: Writing—review and editing, MSA: Writing—review and editing, CF: Writing—review and editing, PD: Writing—review and editing, WSA: Writing—review and editing, IK: Writing—review and editing, RM: Writing—review and editing, GSG: Writing—review and editing, CJM: Methodology, Formal analysis, CA: Writing—review and editing, RMA: Writing—review and editing, WCW: Writing—review and editing, GCF: Writing—review and editing, AA: Writing—review and editing, Writing—original draft, Supervision, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. |
Vol 138 - N° 3
P. 495 - mars 2025 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
