Comparative evaluation of propolis, fluoride and probiotic mouthwashes on streptococcus mutans and oxidative stress in fixed orthodontic patients: A triple-blind, randomized controlled trial with 9-month follow-up - 16/05/25
, Nithya Nandhini 4, Sangeetha Ulaganathan 5Highlights |
• | Propolis mouthwash demonstrated superior antibacterial and antioxidative effects compared to fluoride and probiotic mouthwashes in orthodontic patients. |
• | Streptococcus mutans levels were significantly reduced in the propolis group, with the highest cycle threshold values indicating reduced bacterial load. |
• | Oxidative stress (8-OHdG levels) significantly declined, with the propolis group showing the greatest reduction suggesting its potential in mitigating inflammation and enamel demineralization. |
• | All three mouthwashes were well tolerated with high compliance. Although no statistically significant differences were observed in burning sensation, the probiotic group showed comparatively lower antibacterial activity positioning propolis as a promising adjunct in orthodontic care. |
Summary |
Background |
Fixed orthodontic appliances increase the risk of enamel demineralization due to plaque accumulation. While fluoride mouthwash is well established, propolis and probiotic formulations are emerging alternatives with antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory potential.
Aim |
To compare the effects of propolis, fluoride, and probiotic mouthwashes on Streptococcus mutans levels and oxidative stress (8-OHdG) in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment.
Materials and methods |
Of 120 patients screened (March 2022–February 2023), 90 were randomized into three groups (n=30 each): propolis, fluoride, and probiotic. S. mutans was quantified at baseline, 30 days, 3-, 6- and 9-months using Q-PCR. Salivary 8-OHdG was measured using ELISA. Dietary and oral hygiene behaviours were monitored through a mobile app, interviews and 24-hour dietary recalls.
Results |
S. mutans levels (log10 CFU/mL) significantly decreased (P<0.001) at 9 months: from 4.35±0.45 to 0.89±0.06 (propolis), 4.42±0.49 to 2.74±0.18 (fluoride), and 4.38±0.50 to 3.21±0.06 (probiotic). Ct values increased accordingly, confirming reduced bacterial load. Salivary 8-OHdG (ng/mL) declined significantly (P<0.001): 3.8±0.8 to 0.32±0.14 (propolis), 3.9±0.7 to 1.32±0.18 (fluoride), 3.8±0.6 to 2.42±0.22 (probiotic).
Conclusion |
Propolis mouthwash produced the greatest reductions likely due to the combined effect of standardized extract and essential oils added for taste. Fluoride remained effective for microbial control, while probiotics offered modest benefit. High compliance strengthened these findings. Further studies should isolate active components and assess long-term effects in broader settings.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Streptococcus mutans, Oxidative stress, Propolis, Fluoride, Probiotic, Orthodontic treatment, Mouthwash
Plan
Vol 23 - N° 4
Article 101017- décembre 2025 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Three-dimensional assessment of mini-implant supported maxillary canine retraction with and without power arm in class II division 1 patients: A split-mouth randomized trial
- Anas Nedal Kassas, Ahmed Mohamed Kamel, Mohammad Hasan Mohammad, Maher Abd El-Salam Fouda, Mona Abdelaziz Montasser
- Vertical changes following alignment of palatally displaced maxillary lateral incisors with the Invisalign® appliance: A retrospective study
- Zahraa Albarki, Tony Weir, Maurice J. Meade
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?