Deep learning reconstruction in biparametric prostate MRI: Impact on qualitative and radiomics analyses - 23/05/25
, Evan McNabb b, e, 1, Juan Castro a, Ibtisam Al-Qanoobi a, Yoshie Omiya a, b, Kenny Ah-Lan a, Véronique Fortier a, b, Giovanni Artho a, Caroline Reinhold a, b, Simon Gauvin a, bHighlights |
• | Overall image quality was not significantly improved using DLR on prostate MRI exams. |
• | Most radiomics features were significantly different between non-DLR and DLR images. |
• | Classifiers from MRI radiomics features must be aware of the reconstruction method. |
Abstract |
Objective |
To assess the impact of a commercially available deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm on qualitative and radiomics analyses in prostate MRI.
Methods |
This single-centre retrospective cohort included 25 consecutive patients who underwent a prostate MRI (1.5 T) in 2022. T2-weighted (T2WI), diffusion-weighted (DWI; b = 50, 1000, extrapolated 2000 s/mm2) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images were reconstructed using DLR and standard (non-DLR) techniques. The two sets were mixed and blind-reviewed independently by six radiologists. Images were qualitatively scored according to PI-QUAL score, overall image quality, diagnostic confidence, anatomical conspicuity, artifact, and noise. Transition and peripheral zones were segmented and radiomics features extracted from region-of-interests using Pyradiomics package. Qualitative criteria and radiomics were compared using a pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results |
PI-QUAL score was not significantly different (p = 0.32). Overall image quality was not significantly different (p = 0.21 on T2WI and 0.56 on DWI/ADC). Noise was lower on DLR images for T2WI (p < 0.01) and DWI/ADC (p = 0.04). Diagnostic confidence in excluding clinically significant cancer (PI-RADS ≥ 3) in the transition zone was lower with DLR images (p = 0.02). In the transition zone, 89/93 (96 %) of the radiomics features were significantly different between non-DLR and DLR images on T2WI, 68/93 (73 %) on DWI b-2000 s/mm2, and 55/93 (59 %) on ADC images. In the peripheral zone, 91/93 (98 %) were significantly different on T2WI, 50/93 (54 %) on DWI b-2000 s/mm2, and 70/93 (75 %) on ADC images.
Conclusion |
Radiomics features were significantly different on DLR images which should encourage caution for clinical and research purposes. DLR algorithm decreases noise while preserving overall image quality.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Deep learning reconstruction, Prostate MRI, Qualitative analysis, Radiomics
Abbreviations : MRI, DLR, T2WI, DWI, ADC
Plan
Vol 14
Article 100059- juin 2025 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
