The accuracy of artificial intelligence in identifying cephalometric landmarks: A scoping review - 04/07/26
, Asa Auta 2, Jeremy Brown 2, Richard Cure 3, Robert Ireland 4Summary |
Background |
Accurate identification of cephalometric landmarks is essential for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Manual landmarking is time-consuming, requires clinical expertise, and is susceptible to intra- and inter-examiner variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential tool to automate this process, improving efficiency and consistency.
Aims |
To map the current evidence on the use of AI for cephalometric landmark detection, identify trends in the AI methodologies employed, and highlight gaps in the literature requiring further research.
Methods |
This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline were searched up to April 2024, and identified 68 eligible studies. Data extracted included datasets used, numbers of landmarks assessed and expert examiners involved, AI algorithms employed, and reported performance outcomes.
Results |
The included studies analysed approximately 450,000 lateral cephalograms, frequently using the IEEE ISBI Grand Challenge 2015 dataset. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most common AI architecture. Several AI systems achieved landmark localisation comparable to expert clinicians, with mean errors within 2 mm, although performance varied between studies and landmarks. Heterogeneity in study design, datasets, validation methods, and reporting standards limited comparison of the findings.
Conclusions |
AI may have a role in supporting cephalometric landmark detection. However, considerable variation in reported performance outcomes was observed across studies, potentially reflecting differences in landmark identification protocols, algorithm design, and dataset characteristics. The evidence remains heterogeneous, and further research using standardised methodologies and diverse datasets is needed to evaluate the applicability of these systems in routine clinical practice.
DOI registration link on OSF: CGVSU (accessed on June 29, 2026).
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Artificial intelligence, Cephalometric analysis, Deep learning, Lateral cephalogram, Machine learning
Plan
Vol 24 - N° 4
Article 101205- décembre 2026 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
