Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinically node-negative penile cancer versus radical inguinal lymphadenectomy: A comparative study - 18/08/11
, Marco De Sio b, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo c, Luigi Gallo a, Rocco Damiano d, Massimo D’Armiento b, Antonio Gallo aAbstract |
Objectives |
To evaluate the reliability and morbidity of dynamic sentinel node biopsy compared with radical inguinal lymphadenectomy (RIL) in the treatment of selected patients with squamous cell penile carcinoma.
Methods |
We retrospectively considered patients with clinically node-negative Stage pT2-pT3 penile cancer. From 1994 to 2000, 48 patients (group 1, mean age 63 years) underwent penectomy and, after 4 weeks, prophylactic bilateral RIL. From 2001 to 2004, 22 patients (group 2, mean age 67 years) underwent penectomy and dynamic sentinel node biopsy. After 4 weeks, bilateral RIL was performed.
Results |
In group 1, nodal disease was found in 39.6% of the patients. Early complications occurred in 21 patients (47.5%), with the most common being seroma formation. Late complications occurred in 18 patients (37.5%), with the most common being leg edema. In group 2, preoperative lymphoscintigraphy revealed no sentinel nodes in 1 patient, unilateral sentinel nodes in 7, and bilateral nodes in 14. A total of 35 sentinel nodes were seen in 42 inguinal regions (mean 0.83), including 27 (77.2%) identified with the probe and blue dye and 8 (22.8%) located with the probe only. Metastases were noted in 8 (36.4%) of 22 patients, bilaterally in 4 of them. Early minor complications occurred in 3 patients (13.6%). The technique had an 89% negative predictive value and 90% sensitivity.
Conclusions |
The results of this study have shown that dynamic sentinel node biopsy is a minimally invasive technique that is easy to perform, with similar results to those of RIL, but lower morbidity. This procedure offers the possibility of less-extensive surgery for clinically node-negative penile carcinoma.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 66 - N° 6
P. 1282-1286 - décembre 2005 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
